Quantcast
Channel: Rex Parker Does the NYT Crossword Puzzle
Viewing all 4509 articles
Browse latest View live

Heavy chorus instrument in Il Trovatore / TUE 5-31-22 / Group targeted for destruction in Independence Day / Classical queen who cursed a Trojan fleet / Request to someone dressing your submarine sandwich / Brand with flavor Cookie Cobblestone / Competition favoring flexible contestants / Powder-based beverage

$
0
0
Constructor: Sam Buchbinder and Brad Wilber

Relative difficulty: Medium (normal Tuesday)


THEME: LET'S PUT A PIN IN IT (38A: Suggestion to defer discussion ... and what might be said of 17-, 25-, 46- and 60-Across) — places where one might put a "pin" (of one kind or another):

Theme answers:
  • VOODOO DOLL (17A: Figure in many hexes)
  • CLOTH DIAPER (25A: Alternative to Huggies or Luvs)
  • BOWLING LANE (46A: Place for splits and spares)
  • ATM MACHINE (60A: $$$ dispenser)
Word of the Day:"I LOST It at the Movies" (7D: "___ It at the Movies" (collection of Pauline Kael reviews) —

I Lost It at the Movies is a 1965 book that serves as a compendium of movie reviews written by Pauline Kael, later a film critic from The New Yorker, from 1954 to 1965. The book was published prior to Kael's long stint at The New Yorker; as a result, the pieces in the book are culled from radio broadcasts that she did while she was at KPFA, as well as numerous periodicals, including Moviegoer, the Massachusetts ReviewSight and SoundFilm CultureFilm Quarterly and Partisan Review. It contains her negative review of the then widely acclaimed West Side Story, glowing reviews of other movies such as The Golden Coach and Seven Samurai, as well as longer polemical essays such as her largely negative critical responses to Siegfried Kracauer's Theory of Film and Andrew Sarris's Film Culture essay Notes on the Auteur Theory, 1962. The book was a bestseller upon its first release, and is now published by Marion Boyars Publishers.

Kael's first book is characterized by an approach where she would often quote contemporary critics such as Bosley Crowther and Dwight Macdonald as a springboard to debunk their assertions while advancing her own ideas. This approach was later abandoned in her subsequent reviews, but is notably referred to in Macdonald's book, Dwight Macdonald On Movies (1969).

When an interviewer asked her in later years as to what she had "lost", as indicated in the title, Kael averred: "There are so many kinds of innocence to be lost at the movies." It is the first in a series of titles of books that would have a deliberately erotic connotation, typifying the sensual relation Kael perceived herself as having with the movies, as opposed to the theoretical bent that some among her colleagues had. (wikipedia)

• • •

The fill in this one is pretty plain, so everything is really riding on that revealer, and thankfully it delivers. It's one of those idioms I've never used and am only aware of from representations of business or other types of meetings on television or in the movies. Maybe I've heard it a jillion times at meetings I've been in and, like most business-speak, I've tuned it out. Is putting a pin in "it" different from tabling "it"? Nope, "Table" means "postpone consideration of," so I guess someone somewhere just decided the idiom needed livening up. Anyway, it should be a familiar enough expression to most people, and the set of themers covers the "pin" bases very nicely, with VOODOO DOLL expressing the theme most literally or precisely, and the meaning of "pin" getting slightly, uh, bendier from there on: safety pin, bowling pin, PIN number, which is by far my favorite context for "pin" here, mostly because I envisioned the literalists going nuts over the phrase ATM MACHINE ("redundant!," they cried, "the 'M' already stands for 'machine'!"), without realizing that the brilliance of ATM MACHINE as a famously redundant expression here is that the PIN that is relevant here is involved in *yet another* famously redundant expression, namely PIN NUMBER ("redun-... [chokes, sputters] ... -dant! The 'N' .... the ... 'N'!"). So either you're double-mad or you see it as a kind of redundancy joke. I choose option B.


Lots of 3s 4s and 5s today so not much room to get any pizazz into the grid. POOL PARTY sounds fun right about now, but I'm gonna need more than just one ONION RING if we're gonna really get things hopping. I don't love I LOST as fill, but I love the clue. It's a genuinely famous collection of reviews, and I like the New York(er)-ness of the answer. There are good and bad ways for the NYTXW to be obsessed with its home city. This is a good way (Kael wrote for The New Yorker for decades, those decades being primarily the '70s and '80s). There were one too many crossreference clues in this puzzle for my taste, which is to say there were two. PIE / PAN I didn't mind, as those answers intersect, so I didn't have to go looking all over hell and gone to find the other part. The two parts of ICE / CUBE are also relatively close to each other, but having had one crossreference already by the time I got there, I was full. Could've been worse. Could've gone with ARM / REST for the crossreference trifecta. Speaking of ARM, feels like ART or ARC would be better there, which is to say I would never go with a SIM (narrow, old video game-related singular suitable only for xword emergencies, IMHO), when I could get an ordinary word like SIT or SIC in there and clue it All Kinds of Ways. Ordinary words with broad cluing potential > narrowly specific proper nouns if those narrowly specific proper nouns are, themselves, crosswordese of a sort. The reason I'm spending time on this largely unimportant corner is that the SIM clue had "Member of ... family" in it, and so having SI-, I wrote in SIS (and could just as easily have written in SIB). Not real thrilled about cluing ambiguity around an answer that should have, and could have easily, been a different answer. 


More things:
  • 2D: $$$ (MOOLA)— wrote in MONEY. I like that "$$$" appears in this grid twice (see the ATM MACHINE clue). I feel like the puzzle is low-key winking at us a bunch, and today I somehow don't mind.
  • 9D: Clumsy (MALADROIT)— pretty high-falutin' word for a Tuesday. Had the MAL- and still needed a bunch of crosses to remember that MALADROIT (a fine word, actually) existed. 
  • 37D: Wreck room? (STY)— didn't really get this at all ("the pigs just live there ... it's not a 'wreck' to them!") until I realized that STY here is just a metaphor for a messy room, of course.
  • 47D: Shade of some turning leaves (OCHER)— my least favorite fall color, first because it just sounds / looks bad ... like a disease that okra would have ... and second because I can never spell it confidently, probably because it can be spelled two ways: OCHRE / OCHER. The OCHRE spelling is preferred in Britain and other non-US places, but while the NYTXW indicates Britishness for many -RE-spelled words (LITRE, for instance), it never does so for OCHRE, so you just have to guess.
Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld 

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

Full of noxious vapors / WED 6-1-22 / Only living creature in the genus Dromaius / City near Provo Bay

$
0
0
Constructor: Chase Dittrich

Relative difficulty: Hard!! (18:14)



THEME: Phrases where the first word is hidden inside circle letters for... some.... reason?? (Seriously, did I miss something?)

Theme answers:
  • Info not typically found in the Yellow Pages-- (HOME) PHONE NUMBER
  • Creative activity for grade-schoolers-- (ARTS) AND CRAFTS
  • Reason to sleep with a nightlight on-- (FEAR) OF THE DARK
  • Prized possessions for numismatists-- (COIN) COLLECTIONS

Word of the Day: PAELLA (Rice dish infused with saffron) —
In 2015, an emoji for paella was proposed to Unicode. The emoji was approved for Unicode 9.0 as U+1F958 "SHALLOW PAN OF FOOD" in June 2016. Although it is generally rendered as paella, Samsung has rendered the symbol as a Korean hot pot.
• • •

Happy Malaika MWednesday to all who celebrate! I am grumpy as I write this because the G train is not running and I had to bike for half an hour home after playing volleyball tonight and my legs hurt so so so much. Sorry for not being my usual Ray of Sunshine (TM), and please take everything I say with a grain of salt, anyway, I did not like this puzzle.

Here is me complaining about the theme:

I don't get the theme. Truly, what was the point? Why are half of the theme answers stand-alone phrases and the other half are bizarre partials? What do HOME / ARTS / FEAR / COIN have to do with each other, besides having four letters? Why open with a theme entry that seems to suggest many added layers (the Yellow Pages do have PHONE NUMBERs, they just don't have (HOME) PHONE NUMBERs, tricky tricky!!) when you're immediately going to follow it up with AND CRAFTS which is meaningless? 



Here is me complaining about fill:

Soooo many things that I do not care about in this puzzle, like a golf player and a 90-year old writer who inconveniently has the same last name and number of letters as a much more current writer, and classical music and baseball stats. I do not like to use the word "cr*sswordese" because, since everyone has their own definition for it, it just invites chaotic arguments. So instead I say, these are the words that were in this puzzle that I have learned from doing crosswords, and (upon learning them) have never ever seen them outside of a crossword puzzle: STNS (that is simply not a real abbreviation, I take the train and the bus constantly (EXCEPT WHEN THE G IS NOT RUNNING THRU BEDFORD-NOSTRAND DUE TO TRACK MAINTENANCE!!!!)), EFTS, RBIS. RONDO, OREM, and ETO would be in this category as well, except that I have not actually learned them. Don't remember ever seeing these before in all my years (two, lmao) of solving.

Here is me being nice:

A lot of the long down entries and mid-length fill were nice, like NINTENDO, STEAM CAR, and TAROT CARDS. (I typo-ed that as "torta cards" and, like, can you imagine???) PAELLA, RANDOS, and ASHLEE Simpson. All fit my definition of fun fill which is "they would be exciting to see in a themeless grid." The clue [Washington post?] for EMBASSY absolutely rocked.

Bullets:
  • JOB-- Word with snow or bank. Can someone explain this? What's a "snow job"?
  • LEA-- "Back to the Future" actress Thompson. I've never heard of her; my preferred LEA is Salonga.
  • PLO-- Arafat's grp. I don't remember seeing this in a grid before, although apparently it appears often enough. This weekend I learned a "fun" fact: In Israel, it is illegal for a Jewish person to marry a non-Jew. (The government will recognize marriages that took place outside of the country.)
  • ENID-- Children's author Blyton. I grew up reading her books-- mostly "The Secret Seven," but also all her hundreds of fairy tales. I think she's racist probably, but I'm a little scared to look into it and discover the full extent of the situation.
xoxo Malaika

The past seven puzzles were written by eight men; I believe seven are white.

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

1930s Depression-fighting org. / Where Ulysses encountered the Cyclops / Capital city with three consecutive vowels / Farm delivery letters / Charity even involving a coast-to-coast human chain / Places to find dishes of different cultures

$
0
0
Constructor: Michael Lieberman

Relative difficulty: Easy-Medium


THEME: "With 1 Across" / "With 1 Down" — the theme repurposes a cluing convention, taking the common opening clue phrases, "With 1-Across" and "With 1-Down," which normally denote cross-references, and using them literally instead—that is, you have to add the word "Across" (or "Down") to the answer (1 time, I guess) to make sense of it:

Theme answers:
  • SHOT [ACROSS] THE BOW (16A: With 1 Across, warning at sea)
  • KNOCK [DOWN] DRAG OUT (26A: With 1 Down, like a free-for-all fight)
  • HANDS [ACROSS] AMERICA (42A: With 1 Across, charity event involving a coast-to-coast human chain)
  • UPSIDE [-DOWN[ CAKE (56A: With 1 Down, dessert sometimes made with pineapple)
Word of the Day: Cicely TYSON (63A: Three-time Emmy winner Cicely) —


Cicely Louise Tyson
 (December 19, 1924 – January 28, 2021) was an American actress. In a career which spanned more than seven decades in film, television and theatre, she became known for her portrayal of strong African-American women. Tyson received various awards including three Emmy Awards, a Screen Actors Guild Award, a Tony Award, an Honorary Academy Award, and a Peabody Award.

Having appeared in minor film and television roles early in her career, Tyson garnered widespread attention and critical acclaim for her performance as Rebecca Morgan in Sounder (1972); she was nominated for both the Academy Award for Best Actress and Golden Globe Award for Best Actress in a Motion Picture – Drama for her work in the film. Tyson's portrayal of the title role in the 1974 television film The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman, based on the 1971 novel of the same name by Ernest J. Gaines, won her further praise; among other accolades, the role won her two Emmy Awards and a nomination for a BAFTA Award for Best Actress in a Leading Role. She received another Emmy Award nomination for her role as Binta in the acclaimed series Roots (1977).

Tyson continued to act on film and television in the 21st century in projects such as Fried Green Tomatoes (1991), A Lesson Before Dying (1999), Because of Winn-DixieDiary of a Mad Black Woman (both 2005), The Help (2011), The Trip to Bountiful (2014) and Last Flag Flying (2017). She also played the recurring role of Ophelia Harkness in the ABClegal drama TV series How to Get Away With Murder since the show's inception in 2014, for which she was nominated for the Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Guest Actress in a Drama Series five times. (wikipedia)

• • •

The off-brand punctuation (or non-punctuation) in the first themer should've tipped you off immediately that something funky (if not STENCHy) was going on. When the NYTXW wants you to look at 1-Across or 1-Down, you get hyphens between the "1" and the "Across" (or "Down"). Today, no hyphen, which set off alarm bells. Which isn't to say that I didn't actually look at 1-Across at first. Thought maybe the [Warning at sea] was SHOT BACK ... something something. But then I thought "what if I mentally added the actual word "ACROSS" ...?" and there it was: SHOT [ACROSS] THE BOW. I wrote in SHOT THE BOW, it looked stupid and felt wrong, but then the crosses worked, so ... yay? After this, all the themers were a cinch because every theme clue essentially hands you one of the words in the answer. I absolutely no-looked "HANDS [ACROSS] AMERICA"—got HANDS, added ACROSS, and there was nowhere else for that answer to go. I don't think they actually got people to hold hands all the way Across America, but I'm realizing that my memory is heavily mediated by "The Simpsons"'s representation of the event, so who knows? (Well, someone knows, probably). Anyway, like "We Are The World,""HANDS [ACROSS] AMERICA" was one of those high-profile, bad song-driven charity thingies that feel like they happened only in the '80s, i.e. my adolescence. So though the actual event is a haze, the song, unfortunately, is seared forever in my brain—well, the chorus, for sure. 


I'm on record as not being a huge fan of nonsense-in-the-grid themes. It would be funnier / more entertaining if all the Across-less / Down-less answers at least made funny phrases, so I can imagine my own wacky clues, but KNOCK DRAG OUT makes zero sense, even wackily (unless you know a guy named "Drag"). Same with HANDS AMERICA. UPSIDE CAKE would be a good theme answer for a TAKE DOWN puzzle (you know, where you "take""DOWN" out of a familiar phrase, creating a wacky phrase, etc.). You could clue it wackily and everything: [Confection for the optimistic?], something like that. As is, this is a one-note gimmick. It's a cute idea, but on paper (or screen), it kind of fades the second you grasp it. And the fill is pretty crosswordese-laden, so there's not much here for you, joy-wise, once you get the trick. "I CAN'T EVEN" and "THAT'S ON ME" are nice colloquialisms, but that's about it for high points. The puzzle was also pretty easy for a Thursday, though it was thorny enough in places to make me work. Started at MI-AN / -ABS for what was probably two seconds but felt like an eternity. Couldn't remember a thing about "A Farewell to Arms" and couldn't even make sense of MI-AN, and the "dishes of different cultures" part of the LABS clue absolutely fooled me. I was stuck on food, until I wasn't. Had TEASES before TAUNTS (17D: Baits, in a way), and despite belonging to a CSA, couldn't figure out how "letters" applied to a "farm delivery" (maybe that's because we pick our CSA up at the farmers market—no "delivery" involved) (39A: Farm delivery letters). 


Bullet points:
  • 3D: Benjamin (C-NOTE)— first thing I put in the grid. Always feels slightly like cheating when I lean heavily on old-school crosswordese for traction, and traction doesn't get any old-schoolier than C-NOTE ETNA ATHOS 
  • 34A: 1930s Depression-fighting org. (NRA) — Nope. Nope nope nope. Nope. "But we've clued it as a different—" Nope. I look at the grid, I see NRA, and it's school shooting / hospital shootings (yesterday) / white supremacy and terrorism. There are actually very few answers I'd like to see wiped from the grid forever, no matter the clue; this is one of them.
  • 28D: West of Malibu (KANYE) — So ... he lives there, I guess? Kinda weird. I get that you're going for a misdirection, a misdirection direction, a clue that makes us read "West" as a direction, but I can't imagine cluing any other celebrity by the place where they just happen to reside. Looks like he (famously?) bought a $57 million house there. Meh. Lifestyles of "celebrities," extremely not my beat.
  • 15D: "Brooklyn Nine-Nine" actor Robinson (CRAIG) — had no idea here. Is this the Old Spice guy? Hey, wait, this is Darryl from "The Office"! OK (OK), I know exactly who this guy is. He was on that show for the whole damn run, whereas he's only been on 9 episodes of "Brooklyn Nine-Nine," what the hell?! What a weird clue. (P.S. the "Old Spice guy" is Terry Crews)
  • 48D: Mini freezer? (BRAKE)— the groaniest of groaners. Even after I had the answer, I wasn't entirely sure how "Mini" worked. "How is a BRAKE"mini"? Miniature in relation to what!?" But, sigh, they mean the car brand Mini. So the BRAKE makes a Mini (i.e. the car) freeze (i.e. stop). As the answer next door says, YIKES (49D: "Oh, no!")
Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

African river with a notorious name / FRI 6-3-22 / One of three brothers in a Puzo best seller / Designer Kamali who made Farrah Fawcett's iconic red swimsuit / Company with the motto When you rise we shine / Supplied with dough as a bakery / Non-taxing part of air travel

$
0
0
Constructor: Robyn Weintraub

Relative difficulty: Easy


THEME: none 

Word of the Day: LEE Krasner (37D: Abstract artist Krasner) —


Lenore "Lee" Krasner
 (born Lena Krassner; October 27, 1908 – June 19, 1984) was an American abstract expressionist painter, with a strong speciality in collage. She was married to Jackson Pollock. Although there was much cross-pollination between their two styles, the relationship somewhat overshadowed her contribution for some time. Krasner's training, influenced by George Bridgman and Hans Hofmann, was the more formalized, especially in the depiction of human anatomy, and this enriched Pollock's more intuitive and unstructured output.

Krasner is now seen as a key transitional figure within abstraction, who connected early-20th-century art with the new ideas of postwar America, and her work fetches high prices at auction. She is also one of the few female artists to have had a retrospective show at the Museum of Modern Art. (wikipedia)

• • •

When I talk about that ideal "Zoom-Zoom" feeling that I look for in a Friday puzzle—well, this is it. This is pretty much Peak It. Feels like months since I've zipped around a grid with such a feeling of acrobatic joy, with long answers just unfurling Down and Across, plummeting, soaring. Very rollercoastery feel to this one, with the car somewhat slowly crawling out of its starting position in the NW and then ... whoosh, big drop through the CIRCULAR FILE and you're off!


And then, to borrow another metaphor, it's just fireworks—long, vivid answers just exploding in first one direction and then another. The puzzle could've stood to be a little harder, but if you make it Too hard, then the solver doesn't get the propulsive feeling that makes the puzzle so exhilarating. Only halfway through the puzzle and I already feel like I've been rocketing through space (with STARFLEET, past ICE PLANETs and god knows what else):


I had to work a bit to get started, which is normal. Wanted REBUS in that 1-Across slot (1A: Puzzle genre = LOGIC). Wanted LOBO but wasn't Sure sure, so had to fiddle around. Neither OLE nor OPAL immediately leapt out at me (though I did consider OLE), but then I hit GENE, and rode that backwards through my earlier failures, GENE to OLE to LOBO and OPAL, and then LOGIC was visible and off we go. Had a tad more trouble trying to get CANOLA and EBOLA from their back ends (-LA and -A, respectively) as I was trying to make my way down the west side. CELS would've helped a lot, by giving me the first letters of both words, but CELS was well and truly hidden—I went looking in space when the answer was in animation (25D: Images of Pluto, perhaps), so I used LEVAR to get LEVARage in there, and after I changed my initial misspelling of his name (from LAVAR to LEVAR), then ABET slid in there and things started moving. There were no other sticking points thereafter. Meanwhile, the fireworks just never stopped, even when I was making the final turn, counterclockwise up into the NE, colorful bursts of fill were still, uh, filling the grid:


If I have any criticism of this grid (and it's pretty weak, as criticisms go), it's that it's Too much for me. That is, it's a super duper Gen-X'y puzzle. If you had parents who were into Jimi Hendrix and/or The Monkees (mine weren't, but I certainly knew who those acts were since childhood), and then spent at least part of your childhood watching "The Carol Burnett Show" on CBS or Farrah Fawcett on "Charlie's Angels" (or had that iconic Farrah poster over your bed, as my stepbrother did) (15D: Designer Kamali who made Farrah Fawcett's iconic red swimsuit = NORMA) ... if you waited in huge lines to see "The Empire Strikes Back" on opening day (guilty), spent your adolescence watching George WENDT on "Cheers," discovered Judi DENCH movies in your '20s and then maybe watched "Gilmore Girls" or at least grew up to eventually discover and watch the show with your own child (23A: Graham of "Gilmore Girls" = LAUREN) ... if any or all of those things were true for you or those adjacent to you, then you probably had a reasonably easy time with this one. Of course, you might be 18 or 81 and still have found it easy. I am just slightly cautious in my raving in case I'm missing some kind of generational exclusivity that might make others feel different.


Bullets:
  • 17A: Supplied with dough, as a bakery (BANKROLLED) — I can't tell what this clue thinks it's doing. [Supplied with dough] is plenty. The "bakery" thing not only doesn't add clear context, it distracts by attempting a clunky misdirection. I see that they are trying to do something with "dough" here, but when you add "as a bakery," it's like you're taking what should be a natural ambiguity / misdirection and forcing the issue. "Think of the wrong kind of dough!" the clue seems to be begging. Seems a cheap move. Also, I can't tell if there's some kind of pun on "roll" going on here or not. Puns are bad enough when you *know* they're happening.
  • 21A: It's down in France (DUVET)— yeah, it's down elsewhere, too. We have DUVETs here now. And they're called DUVETs. So, again, weird additional clue words try to force the misdirection.
  • 53A: Buildings with many wings (BIRDHOUSES) — OK, but this actually reads gruesomely, since I have to imagine disembodied wings, which I've seen plenty of at the base of the Security Mutual building downtown, where falcons absolutely feast on pigeons and leave the less edible pigeon parts for us to find on the sidewalk. So I just imagined BIRDHOUSES full of bird murder, is what I'm saying. Still, it's not a bad clue, and the misdirection is natural, not forced.
  • 40A: Dressed, so to speak (DECENT) — this expression is old-fashioned in a way that I find adorable, despite the implication that there is anything indecent about being unclothed. It's got a colloquial quality I like, even if it's not something I would say.
  • 48D: Private dining room (MESS)— more natural misdirection (not your typical adjectival "private"—the "private" here is in the Army)
  • 6D: Looks like a jerk (OGLES) — about as good a clue as you're going to get on this leering bit of crosswordese. You could also have figured out a way to cross-reference CREEP here; I wouldn't have minded.
Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld 

P.S. the "Puzo best seller" is "The Godfather" (35A) and OTIS is a co. that makes elevators, in case that wasn't clear (6A: Company with the motto "When you rise, we shine").

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

LGBT rights activist Windsor / SAT 6-4-22 / Senator after whom Honolulu's airport is named / Personal identifier in the Deaf community / Gram alternative / Popular half-hour sketch comedy of the 1970s-'80s with The / Onetime candy maker based in Revere Mass

$
0
0
Constructor: Scott Earl

Relative difficulty: Easy-Medium


THEME: none 

Word of the Day: DRAG MOTHER (33A: Mentor to a queen) —

When an aspiring drag queen is just starting out in the world, she needs someone to turn to for guidance, support, and makeup tips. When a more seasoned queen takes an ingénue under her wing, that usually means she becomes her “mother.” RuPaul herself is regarded as such a pioneer and trailblazer that many drag queens deferentially call her “mother,” as well.

It’s a beautiful mentor-apprentice relationship that can help a younger queen learn the tricks of the trade, including how to get bookings around her city. Most new queens find a drag mother by exploring the club scene or having friends in the community who dabble in the art. (fandom.com)

• • •

(33D: It gets hatched in a
fantasy novel)
Well it helps if Daniel INOUYE was a gimme for you, as he was for me. Whether you do or don't know that name probably made a Huge difference as to how easy this puzzle felt, at least initially. When I can plunk down the 1-Across answer with no help from crosses on a Saturday, that is typically a sign that not much resistance lies ahead, and while there was a lot more resistance than yesterday, overall this thing played very much on the Easy side. Probably no one wants to be reminded that INOUYE was repeatedly, credibly accused of sexual harassment, including by current NY senator Kirsten Gillibrand. Actually, that's not the worst of it. There are decades-old stories of sexual misconduct that is much worse than the groping Gillibrand described ("there were nine women I talked to who had told me stories of molestation and rape"). The guy was a WWII war hero, which probably bought him a lot of leeway and good will, but I can't see his name now without thinking about the serial sexual abuse of women by powerful men, so while I was thrilled to nail a Saturday 1-Across, I was not, actually, thrilled by 1-Across itself. In a puzzle that seems to be striving so hard for a warm and inclusive feeling, his name is particularly jarring. But back to the easiness: INOUYE opened up the whole NW, and things flowed steadily from there. Though ... you can see here that just as the puzzle was opening up, I made an error:


Since the [March word] is not really a "word" but more of a noise or grunt ... well, I always thought it was HUT, or at least thought HUT was an option. I know HUT is more, uh, football snap count, but .. I don't know, it sounds military to my ears. What about "Ten HUT!"? That's something, right? Yes! In fact, it's "used to bring a marching band or group of soldiers to attention" (wiktionary) (my emph.). Ugh. This exemplifies my experience of this puzzle as a whole, which is that the longer answers were generally a breeze, but I did get slightly bogged down in oddly clued short stuff, all of the place (not the most pleasant kind of struggle). Let's start with the absolutely absurd "PER year" (7D: ___ year). Any length of time might follow PER, as might "person,""capita,""annum,""axle," etc. Anything, really. Any unit. It's about the vaguest fill-in-the-blank I've ever seen. Really had to stop and think about that "P." Never really heard GEN Chem as an abbr. In college, it was O-Chem this and P-Chem that, but I don't remember anyone's saying GEN Chem. Isn't that just ... Chem? Anyway, I had GEO-Chem there at one point. I thought the CIA was some random CPA from, like, Topeka or something (32A: Actual employer of some "government consultants," in brief); tax pros might have to ... consult ... the government ... right? ... then I forgot that FOY was FOY and wrote in FEY as PER yoozhe, and then the puzzle did that pointedly obnoxious thing where it cross-references two intersecting clues in the vaguest way possible, effectively eliminating one of the crosses needed to get either of the two words (LOCK / KEY). So I enjoyed the longer fill a lot, but unlike on Friday, when the longer fill was really dominating my attention, today, these little 3-letter tar pits were making it harder to feel the whoosh and the zoom of the nice stuff.


But there was a lot of nice stuff, or at least no real weak stuff. Good colloquial energy in "YEAH, SAME" and "OH FORGET IT!" Bouncy slanginess with TIE THE KNOT and COOTIE SHOT. You've got the deaf community (NAME SIGN) and the drag community (DRAG MOTHER) and the pronoun trio (SHEHERHERS) and then, my personal favorite: ALONE TIME (by "favorite" I don't mean it's my favorite answer, I mean irl ALONE TIME rules! I love my family dearly but me without ALONE TIME is ... you don't wanna know. Let's just say "not peak me"). It's a solid grid overall, with lots of original fill. It's oddly free of the less common letters (Z X Q J ... even V). Couple of Ks and Ws are about the only crooked letters in this thing (I like "crooked letters," since it evokes the concept of a "crooked number" on a baseball scoreboard, where it refers to any number other than a zero or a one on a baseball scoreboard. Such numbers are literally crooked by comparison with "0" and "1", but also rarer by comparison, just as Z X Q J are rarer by comparison with other letters ... I'm gonna try using "crooked letters" instead of "Scrabbly letters" and see how that goes). Annnnyway, lots of RLSTNE action here today, but that doesn't keep the answers themselves from being fresh.  


Bullets:
  • 19A: Formal name for 11-Down, in brief (ACA) — at this point, I had the "C" from NECCO (which I always think is NECCA, btw), and truthfully I knew immediately, without looking at 11-Down, that this was going to be ACA and that OBAMACARE must be lurking over at 11-Down. I didn't even bother to jump over and fill OBAMACARE in. I just knew it would be waiting for me, a ginormous freebie. Weird to just know that it was ACA with literally nothing specific in the clue.
  • 55D: What might be a strain in a theater? (ARIA)— so a "strain" means a "tune" or "song," but also, yeah, I bet singing an ARIA is strenuous work.
  • 57A: L.G.B.T. rights activist Windsor (EDIE)— literally just seeing this clue now. That's how easy this section of the puzzle was, I guess. EDIE Windsor (1929-2017) was the lead plaintiff in United States v. Windsor (2013), which was a landmark Supreme Court case concerning same-sex marriage, one that paved the way for the legalization of said marriages in this country following Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). It's Pride Month, so though she seems a worthy answer in general, it's especially nice to see her acknowledged this month.
Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

Moody North Yorkshire setting / SUN 6-5-22 / English indie pop singer Parks / 1960s activist Bobby / Gourmet mushroom with poisonous lookalikes / Common spa descriptor / Precursor to a circuit breaker / First in a line of 13 popes / Fashion guru Tim / Cryptids on snowy mountains / Mars bar with shortbread and chocolate / The Muppets villain Richman / Jimmies and corkscrews

$
0
0
Constructor: Christina Iverson and Katie Hale

Relative difficulty: Easy-Medium (assuming you are familiar with the author names)


THEME:"Let's Get Literature"— familiar phrases that end with a word that then becomes the first part of a famous author's name; answers are all wacky third-person verb phrases:

Theme answers:
  • COMES OUT OF ONE'S SHELLEY (23A: Looks up from reading "Frankenstein"?) (Mary Shelley)
  • GOES THROUGH HELLER (33A: Reads "Catch-22",""Closing Time" and Something Happened" -- and doesn't stop there?) (Joseph Heller)
  • TAKES A LONG WALKER (55A: Borrows "The Color Purple" from the library instead of "The Flowers"?) (Alice Walker)
  • PLAYS THE FIELDING (81A: Listens to "Tom Jones" on audiobook?) (Henry Fielding)
  • BREAKS THE LAWRENCE (100A: Reads "Lady Chatterley's Lover" so many times its spine splits?) (D.H. Lawrence)
  • GIVES A FAIR SHAKESPEARE (117A: Donates some copies of "King Lear" to the Renaissance Festival?) (Gary Shakespeare)
Word of the Day: ARLO Parks (52A: English indie pop singer Parks) —
Anaïs Oluwatoyin Estelle Marinho (born 9 August 2000), known professionally as Arlo Parks, is a British singer-songwriter and poet. Her debut studio album, Collapsed in Sunbeams, was released in 2021 to critical acclaim and peaked at number three on the UK Albums Chart. It earned her nominations for Album of the YearBest New Artist and Best British Female Solo Artist at the 2021 Brit Awards. It won the 2021 Hyundai Mercury Prize for best album. (wikipedia)
• • •

There's very little about this theme that I didn't like. Confession: I am a literature professor. So there's that. But I genuinely think the theme is clever—simple but smart, with a consistency of phrasing (third-person verb phrases) that I found elegant. Seems like there are a lot of potential themers still out there, each of which has exceedingly wacky cluing potential: DELIVERS THE MAILER, JUMPS FOR JOYCE, GOES BEYOND THE PALEY, just to name a few. I think my favorite imagined answer so far is GETS FED UPDIKE, just for the morbid direction the "?" clue might go in. But the set we have here in this grid is strong in its own right. Straightforward, not exactly laugh-out-loud, but solid. The authors in question are all pretty to very well known, with Henry Fielding seeming (to me) to be probably the most likely to cause tilted heads and quizzical expressions. He's a big deal in the history of the novel, but not as much of a household name as he perhaps used to be, even a half century ago (when "Tom Jones" was a big-deal cinematic sensation). There's a nice breadth to the author selection, spanning four centuries, with Alice Walker being the only author still living. There should be some author here for everyone, unless you don't read, or don't read "literature." My point is, the author set seems adequately broad and non-obscure. The theme doesn't yield as much humor as it might, but it holds up OK, and at least doesn't involve the kind of groany, truly bad-pun answers you sometimes see in Sunday themes. And even if none of the answers are LOL funny, they're all cute enough, and the core idea of the theme just ... works. I think the weakest thing about the theme execution was the clue on TAKES A LONG WALKER? Is "The Color Purple" iconically long? (most recent Penguin edition: 304pp.). Would anyone know how long it is relative to "The Flowers"? I've actually never heard of "The Flowers," so I don't know how long it is. Looks like "The Flowers" is actually a short story, two pages long, so ... "The Color Purple" is a longer Walker, anyway. Anyway—Walker is famous and "The Color Purple" is famous and I like the answer phrase, but the clue is assuming an audience knowledge of relative page length that I doubt is there. Also, I didn't care for the title of this puzzle, with its forced, faux-youthy play on the idea of "getting lit," but the title is the title and has nothing to do with whether the puzzle is actually any good or not. Plus, the title *does* follow the basic rules of the theme, so it's got that going for it. 


I shrugged numerous times at proper nouns I was expected to know. I discovered ARLO Parks some time last year, both because her music is enjoyable and because I saw her name and thought, "Oh ... she's coming ... move over, Mr. Guthrie." And here she is! But ELFUDGE!? Is that one word? or is it pseudo-Spanish, like: El Fudge! Currently in my head it rhymes with "roughage." Anyway, it's not a famous cookie type. I mean, it's no MILANO. Also, who is this SAL person? (54D: Blueberry-picking girl of children's literature). I am aware of ... let's see, I think SAL is a mule in some song ("I got a mule and her name is SAL / Fifteen miles on the Erie (!) Canal..."). And SAL owns a pizza parlor in "Do The Right Thing." That is all of my SAL knowledge. Oh, and the baseball player SAL Bando, I know him. This SAL ... is from "Blueberries for SAL" by Robert McCloskey (1948). It is apparently a very famous picture books. I read a metric ton of midcentury picture books as a child. This one somehow completely got by me. And what is TEX Richman? Or, rather, what "The Muppets" are we talking about. Is this a recent movie incarnation? Looks like the 2011 movie version. Huh. OK. I missed that, and even if I'd seen it, I think I'd probably wonder how culturally iconic this TEX person is. He doesn't seem to be part of the broader Muppet universe (if that's a thing). I watched a lot of "Muppet Show" and various Muppet Movies as a kid, and no TEX. But the crosses were fair. OK.


Notes:
  • 1A: Precursor to a circuit breaker (FUSE) — really truly didn't understand what "precursor" meant here. Then again, I know squat-all about electrical systems. We have a circuit box in our basement. Sometimes something, uh, blows, and we have to go down there and flip switches back and forth to reset things. You can see that I am very handy.
  • 56D: "Yuck!" ("EWW!") — one of those rare answers that is also my feeling about the answer. I want to blame the double-W spelling, but it might be even eewier in the double-E version (which I have also seen). 
  • 71A: "Wow!" ("OOH!") — realized just now that the first thing I wrote in as an answer here (off of the middle "O") was ... "WOW!" Just ... wow.
  • 8D: Person in a head set? (CEO)— so the various C-O's are ... a "set" of "head" (or "chief") people? CEO, CFO, CIO ... Is that the "set?" Because if it's not, I don't really know what this clue is doing.
  • 69A: Lifewater and Elixir brand (SOBE) — D'oh! I confused the beverage brand and the noodle type (SOBA), which then led me to write in AGE instead of ERA for 70D: Geological span.
  • 10A: Pointed remark (BARB) — Just before coming upstairs to solve this puzzle and write ... well, this, these words that I am writing right now ... I watched the final episode of Season 4, Part 1 of "Stranger Things." How is this relevant? Well, if you've watched that show from Episode 1 of Season 1, you might be able to guess. BARB is Back! (well, briefly ... sorta ... you'll see for yourself ... or not). 
I want to plug Peter Gordon's latest puzzle project, "A-to-Z Crosswords 2022," which he calls "Petite Pangram Puzzles"—these are 9x11 Easy to Medium puzzles that contain every letter of the alphabet. My experience is that these are very tasty snacks. More meaty than a mini, but small enough and doable enough to knock off during a spare 5, 10, 15 minutes or so (depending on your skill level). The pangramitude means that the fill gets pretty lively in places, and you also always know, if you're struggling, that until you've ticked off all 26 letters, well, those remaining letters are definitely out there ... somewhere. Knowing you gotta touch all 26 actually helps with the solving at times. These puzzles are unusual and fun and snackable. Worth it, for sure. Go here to get your subscription! 


Now for this week's ... 

Letter to the Editor! 

This week's letter comes from Jerome Walker, and it's a response to one of my bullet-point comments on this past Thursday's puzzle (June 2, 2022). For reference, here is my original comment, in its entirety.
  • 15D: "Brooklyn Nine-Nine" actor Robinson (CRAIG) — had no idea here. Is this the Old Spice guy? Hey, wait, this is Darryl from "The Office"! OK (OK), I know exactly who this guy is. He was on that show for the whole damn run, whereas he's only been on 9 episodes of "Brooklyn Nine-Nine," what the hell?! What a weird clue. (P.S. the "Old Spice guy" is Terry Crews)
My initial response to the following letter was fairly defensive, but after I sat with it for a while, I felt it offered a valuable perspective. Here it is:
Dear Mr. Parker,

I started doing the NYT crossword in January 2021, and for the last 463 days I have done the crossword and read your blog each day. I like it when you loved a puzzle and I didn’t, and vice versa. Mostly this is a matter of personal preference and awareness, and I think it’s okay for a good puzzle day for one to be a tough puzzle day for another: it’s what makes being part of a puzzle community exciting! And I like that your write-ups so often push the puzzle to make more good puzzle days for more people. As a relatively new solver, I appreciate any time that I can have fun with a puzzle without having to know some esoteric initialism that’s been in the puzzle 42 times since 2002 but seen little elsewhere. And as a young, Black, queer man, I like to see references in the puzzle that feel contemporary to me as well — I love 20th century actresses as much as the next person who could stomach 463 NYT crossword puzzles, but there’s so much opportunity for new fill and new joy in puzzles when we expand what is puzzle-eligible.

And I think you do a great job of pushing this position forward! Even when it means including fill that you’re not already familiar with. Again, I have learned from you that not everyone has to have the same good puzzle days. But on Thursday, June 2, when Craig Robinson was in the grid, while you didn’t disparage his inclusion (rather, his being clued by a few appearances on Brooklyn Nine-Nine), you first asked if he was the Old Spice guy, Isaiah Mustafa, and then misattributed the Old Spice guy as Terry Crews, a third, separate, Black actor. Yes, Terry Crews has appeared in Old Spice commercials, but Isaiah Mustafa is the “Look at your man, now look at me,” quintessential, original Old Spice guy. A Google search for “Old Spice guy” returns Isaiah Mustafa. I know you probably did not mean anything by it, and I wouldn’t say Mustafa is exactly grid-level famous (though how great would it be to find MUSTAFA in the grid!), but my point here is that eliding these three Black actors, at least two of which are certainly grid-level famous and television staples for nearly 20 years now, does feel disrespectful in a way that is unusual for your blog. It is not sin to confuse an actor or two, but to jumble these three up and publish an incorrect attribution does feel reminiscent of the classic racist idea that Black people are hard to distinguish from one another, which I imagine is part of why Black names have historically found their way into the grid so relatively infrequently. I would flag it as something to be aware of: if we really want the crossword to be a space for all people, and why shouldn’t it be, then we should be careful about who and what is distinguishable enough to recognize in the grid.

All best,
Jerome Walker
I could quibble with some of the details here, but I think the gist of the letter remains worthy of consideration. I have a flippancy that I bring to lots of my riffs on pop culture and celebrity names. This letter is a good reminder that flippancy can read differently to different readers, and that perhaps there's some reason to be careful about not seeming to be dismissive or diminishing when discussing Black people, as well as other people from groups that have long been underrepresented in the grid. I'm always going to have a light, goofy, even somewhat irreverent tone to my writing, but I think there's a way to maintain that tone without conveying disrespect. I found Mr. Walker's sincerity and good will disarming. I'll keep his criticism in mind going forward.

If you have any crossword-related thoughts that you'd like to put into letter form, feel free to send it to me at rexparker at icloud dot com, and be sure to label it OK TO PRINT. Thanks, everyone. See you soon.

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

Element suggested phonetically by NOPQ STUV / MON 6-6-22 / Famed Roman censor / Indigenous people for whom a Great Lake is named / Juice brand with hyphenated name / Measuring instrument that may have a needle

$
0
0
Constructor: Michael Schlossberg

Relative difficulty: Easy side of normal


THEME:"HONEY, I'M HOME!" (63A: Cry after navigating the last parts of the answers to this puzzle's starred clues?) — last words of themers tell a story of a very specific kind of return home through a sequence of locations that form the path the returnee takes:

Theme answers:
  • DELLA STREET (17A: *Secretary of Perry Mason)
  • TWELVE STEPS (23A: *Alcoholics Anonymous program)
  • STICK THE LANDING (39A: *Finish a gymnastics routine perfectly)
  • BOY NEXT DOOR (52A: *Description of a wholesome, clean-cut guy)
Word of the Day: DELLA STREET (17A) —
Della Street is the fictional secretary of Perry Mason in the long-running series of novels, short stories, films, and radio and television programs featuring the fictional defense attorney created by Erle Stanley Gardner. [...] In the first Perry Mason novel, The Case of the Velvet Claws, written in the early days of the Great Depression, Della Street is revealed to have come from a wealthy, or at least well-to-do, family that was wiped out by the stock market crash of 1929. Della was forced to get a job as a secretary. By the time of the TV series in the 1950s and 1960s, this would not have fitted well with the age of the characters as then portrayed. According to The Case of The Caretaker's Cat, she is about 15 years younger than Perry Mason. // Several instances of sexual tension are seen between Mason and Street in the Gardner novels, multiple glances, kisses, and so on, and several proposals of marriage, all of which Della turned down because, at the time, wives of professional men did not work. Thus, she could not have continued as his secretary (and effective partner) and she did not want to give up this aspect of her life. (wikipedia)
• • •

There's something creepily "wholesome" about this puzzle. Like ... I dunno, it wants me to think of a hygienic, sober mid-century nuclear family that watches DELLA STREET on the TV and hopes their daughter will grow up to that nice BOY NEXT DOOR and what not, but my brain really wants to fight this premise, so all I'm imagining is Perry Mason stumbling home drunk to an empty house, calling out "HONEY, I'M HOME" to Della, who is not there and will never be there because Perry has screwed up too many times, so now Della is off somewhere with the BOY NEXT DOOR and Perry's all alone, forever and ever. My version is dark, but I'll still take it over whatever central casting has imagined for us here. Seriously, though, the puzzle has an overall very old vibe, not just in the theme answers and theme concept, but in the quality of the fill as well (STENOS and IDES and VIDI and NENE and APSO and etc. etc.). Also, I don't think BOY NEXT DOOR repurposes the last word enough. That is, the other homecoming locations (STREET, STEPS, LANDING) are strongly reimagined by the theme answer phrases, whereas the BOY NEXT DOOR is just ... there ... next door ... watching you come home ... plotting god knows what, what's wrong with that kid anyway!? Anyway, that DOOR is just a DOOR on the STREET where you live; it hasn't been sufficiently un-DOORed by the theme answer. 

["Amiable handmaiden"!? The disrespect!]

I finished up at O'NEAL and didn't get a "Congrats, you're done!" message from my software, so I checked the cross and corrected that final answer to O'NEIL (53D: Baseball great Buck), but that still didn't get me the all clear, so I scanned the grid for my mistake and it looks like I never fully corrected my very very early and completely inexplicable hiccup on 1D: "Veni, ___, vici":


Caught that one early when I was like "uh, her name is *not* NELLA STREET!?" but apparently forgot to change EDOL to IDOL, blargh. Otherwise, not much happened between start and finish for me. Oh, I wrote in ELENA instead of SONIA (43A: Justice Sotomayor)—got my five-letter Supreme Court first names ending in "A" wires crossed. Thankfully no ALITO today. Had a brief feeling of drawing a blank at PLASMA, since I honestly thought solid & gas & liquid were it (5A: Alternative to solid, liquid or gas). Did they used to teach that to kids in science? Anyway, per wikipedia: "Like a gas, plasma does not have definite shape or volume. Unlike gases, plasmas are electrically conductive, produce magnetic fields and electric currents, and respond strongly to electromagnetic forces" (wikipedia). Weirdly (for someone as scientifically semi-literate as I am), I got ISOMER no problem (67A: Similar chemical compound). Even more weirdly, for someone who does as many puzzles as I do, CIPHER did not come quickly (15A: Coded message). But overall, it's a Monday, there's so much easy stuff floating around the grid that any slight hold-ups were quickly taken care of. 


The only truly remarkable thing happening in the puzzle today is the weird "B" run that the Down clues go on toward the bottom of the grid. Check out the alliteration in 50- through 53-Down: [Baby buggy to Brits / Beauty and the Beast heroine / Baseball great Buck]. I feel like this alliterative indulgence is a sneaky little whim, like someone is trying to see if we'll notice. Well, I noticed, and all I have to say is: respect. Fly your freak flag, you ... Fill Folks. See you tomorrow.

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld 

P.S. here are my ERLE Stanley Gardner shelves (each shelf two rows deep);

[A.A. FAIR = Gardner pseudonym for his Cool & Lam mysteries, which 
I actually prefer to the Perry Mason ones]

P.P.S. LOL I just got this (57A: Element suggested phonetically by NOPQ STUV ...). It's just a segment of the alphabet with the "R" missing, or "gone," thus ... ARGON :/

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

Ingredient in lemon curd / TUES 6-7-22 / Many a mideasterner / Short pants? / Much of Chad and Mali

$
0
0
Hello, everyone! It’s Clare, coming at you a little delayed — this time for the first Tuesday in June. I’m on a little vacation in Berlin and enjoying the trip a lot; I was in Prague before this and am heading to Dublin soon. The weather has been almost perfect, the food has been delicious, and the company has been just alright (hi, Dad!). I’ve been trying to get up to watch the Warriors in the NBA finals, but this time difference has the games in the middle of the night, so it’s pretty challenging! Fingers crossed they pull it off. Anywho, on to the puzzle…

Constructor:
 Carly Schuna

Relative difficulty:Fairly easy

THEME: TECH BOOMS (58A: Big times in Silicon Valley … or a hint to 17-, 25-, 35- and 49-Across?) — Each theme answer relates to technology and ends with something that might make a “boom” sound

Theme answers:
  • PHOTO BOMB (17A: Make a goofy appearance in someone else's picture) 
  • TWEET STORM (25A: Multipost rant online) 
  • COMPUTER CRASH (35A: What the "spinning beach ball of death" might indicate) 
  • EMAIL BLAST (49A: Message sent to many recipients)
Word of the Day: Bo DEREK (61A: Actress/model Bo) —
Bo Derek (born Mary Cathleen Collins, November 20, 1956) is an American actress and model. Her breakthrough film role was in the romantic comedy 10 (1979). Her first husband John Derek directed her in Fantasies; Tarzan, the Ape Man (both 1981); Bolero (1984) and Ghosts Can't Do It (1989), all of which received negative reviews. Widowed in 1998, she married actor John Corbett in 2020. Now semi-retired, she makes occasional film, television, and documentary appearances. 
• • •

That was a pretty nice puzzle; and, it turns out it’s a debut from Carly Schuna. The theme was current, and the theme answers worked well together. I sort of saw where the puzzle was going but didn’t know how it would pull together for the revealer, and I think the revealer mostly works. I’m not sure about whether “boom” works for all of them, but I didn’t really mind because the theme felt clever. 

Some of the fill of the puzzle struck me as a little uncommon, which is probably part of the reason I enjoyed the solve. Like, having RAVEN (20A: "Nevermore" speaker, in poetry) in the puzzle instead of the usual “Poe” was a nice change of pace. Or, even some of the fill just at the top — BORAX, SNOTS, SABLE. You don’t see those much. 

The long downs, as usual, were my favorite part of the puzzle. Seeing DAMMED, CRUMPLES, and MIMICKED was fun. My favorite clue/answer in the whole puzzle was 12D: Subway line as EAT FRESH. And, just next to it, I really like how PROLONGS (11D: Drags out) is a down and feels apt. The sports terms were nice (REB, PACER, MLB), even if they were relatively basic. 

33D: "What's the big idea?!" as HEY made no sense to me, though, and I spent quite a while there figuring that something must be wrong for that to be the answer. Also, do people really call Arnold Schwarzenegger ARNIE (40A)? Seems odd to me. Some of the puzzle seemed geared a little older (BUSMAP, PBS, DEREK, BORAX, MRT, ALF, SAL, etc…), but you also had these very current tech terms as the theme; so, it was a slightly odd juxtaposition. 

Not too much else to say about the puzzle! Nice debut, good theme, some surprising fill. Good start to the day.

Misc.:
  • 31A: Annoying complainer = both my dad and me on this trip; the number of times we’ve each complained about our feet hurting from all this walking (I hit 50k steps in one day!) is astronomical. 
  • 51D: Impressive venue to sell outARENA. That’s cool and all, but try being BTS and selling out a stadium four nights in a row, as they did in the new Las Vegas stadium. That huge theater where the Grammys were held days before? That was the overflow room BTS used to live stream the concert for those who couldn’t get tickets to the stadium. 
  • I only know it as the “rainbow wheel of death” and not the “spinning beach ball of death” (35A), but a quick Google search tells me I seem to be in the minority on that one. I like my version better. 
  • SHARKS don’t have bones (27D)? I feel like, somewhere in my brain, I’d registered that before but then forgot. How odd! I’d say that fact makes them seem less scary somehow, but I’m still terrified of them. I remember some years ago getting the chance to get a scuba diving certification but having a meltdown because I’d be in the ocean with SHARKS. (I persisted and didn’t even see any.)
Signed, Clare Carroll, “Ich bin ein not a Berliner”

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]



Jack of 1950s TV / WED 6-8-22 / Doth choose a comedy routine / Boyle's law subject / Publish private info about online in modern lingo / Strong German brew / Title 6-year-old of 1950s children's literature

$
0
0
Constructor: Bruce Haight

Relative difficulty: Medium 


THEME: -ET to -ETH— familiar phrases have "H" added to the end of one of the words, turning that word into a Shakespearean-sounding verb; the resulting wacky phrases are clued accordingly:

Theme answers:
  • PICKETH LINES (18A: Doth choose a comedy routine?)
  • PUBLIC TOILETH (24A: Citizenry doth work hard?)
  • FAD DIETH (38A: Once-popular activity hath no more fans?)
  • MARKETH PLACES (49A: Doth apply graffiti?)
  • MODEL ROCKETH (58A: Runway walker hath megatalent?)
Word of the Day: ABU Simbel (57A: ___ Simbel (Lake Nasser landmark)) —

Abu Simbel is a historic site comprising two massive rock-cut temples in the village of Abu Simbel (Arabicأبو سمبل), Aswan GovernorateUpper Egypt, near the border with Sudan. It is situated on the western bank of Lake Nasser, about 230 km (140 mi) southwest of Aswan (about 300 km (190 mi) by road). The complex is part of the UNESCO World Heritage Site known as the "Nubian Monuments", which run from Abu Simbel downriver to Philae (near Aswan), and include AmadaWadi es-Sebua, and other Nubian sites. The twin temples were originally carved out of the mountainside in the 13th century BC, during the 19th Dynasty reign of the Pharaoh Ramesses II. They serve as a lasting monument to the king Ramesses II. His wife  Nefertari and children can be seen in smaller figures by his feet, considered to be of lesser importance and were not given the same position of scale. This commemorates his victory at the Battle of Kadesh. Their huge external rock relief figures have become iconic.

The complex was relocated in its entirety in 1968 under the supervision of a Polish archaeologist, Kazimierz Michałowski, from the Polish Centre of Mediterranean Archaeology University of Warsaw, on an artificial hill made from a domed structure, high above the Aswan High Dam reservoir. The relocation of the temples was necessary or they would have been submerged during the creation of Lake Nasser, the massive artificial water reservoir formed after the building of the Aswan High Dam on the River Nile. The project was carried out as part of the UNESCO Nubian Salvage Campaign. (wikipedia)

• • •

It's probably a pretty tight theme set—there are other -ET-to-ETH phrases I could think of off the top of my head, but none of them were exactly Great. You have to be able to turn an -ET word to an -ETH word *and* have the resulting verb phrase be a wakily cluable phrase. So MULLET to MULLETH works, but there are no good MULLET phrases, so you're left with MULLETH HAIRCUT or something like that, which is actually kind of good on the wacky end, but the base phrase "mullet haircut" is just redundant. Anyway, for this theme, the set seems very solid. I just found the concept dreary. Extremely one-note. I got slightly excited there at ART SCHOOL because it had a "?" clue and I thought "oh, is this theme gonna venture into other, non-lisping archaic verb forms!?" But no, ART SCHOOL is not a themer (I mean, how would you clue that, anyway? "Hast thou students inside of ye, building?"). After I got PICKETH LINES, the rest of the answers were super-easy to pick up, and only PUBLIC TOILETH seemed really surprising or inventive. The others just ... fit the theme. The grid was oversized today so that the 8-letter FAD DIETH could sit dead center), so the solving PUBLIC definitely TOILETH longer than usual in order to finish this thing. The way the grid is built, the fill is overwhelmingly short, and unfortunately it's kind of stale (AD REP, OAST, PAAR, etc.). Attempts to unstale it mostly failed. VACAY is slangy in a horrid cloying way that already feels old (I've never felt the need to shorten "vacation" and have never had a conversation with someone who has—probably seen more in texts than heard irl), but maybe it seems fresh to you, that's fine. To me, it was the *fourth* "?" clue I'd seen inside of a small amount of real estate in the NW, so I was already put off the answer before I ever got there. With the "?" clue on VACAY, at least it feels like there's a payoff there, whereas the "?" clues on AMPM (1D: Day and night?) and ARK (4D: Months-long couples retreat?) feel more like lipstick on a pig. Plus, the ARK itself is not "months-long," so that clue should've gone back to phrasing school. I wish there were more high points to this one. It's entirely adequate but the theme just wasn't funny or outrageous enough on the whole, and the fill just did its job and nothing more.


I have "NO & NO" written in the margin by DOX (60D: Publish private info about online, in modern lingo), which is a textbook example of Scrabble-f*cking. Sensing (correctly) that the fill is pretty dull, the constructor decides to cram some Crooked Letters™ (e.g. X, J, Z, Q, K ...) into the margins of the grid in a misguided big to liven things up (you can see the three "X"s in the grid, all of them wedged into the margins). KIX and GEN-X are fine; the latter ends up necessitating some golfer I've never heard of (LEXI), but who cares, there's always some golfer I haven't heard of in the grid (36D: L.P.G.A. star Thompson). My issue was with DOX. The first "NO" I wrote in the margin was for "No, this is an abusive phenomenon used to intimidate and harass whistleblowers, particularly women, and your decorative 'X' is not worth my having to think about *that* in *this* venue." My other "NO" was for the spelling of the word, which I've always seen with two "X"s, but apparently DOX is an acceptable form as well. I don't like it, but I guess I'll accept it, reluctantly. I would not have resented the word nearly so much if it weren't such obvious, desperate Scrabble-f*cking. If you had needed the "X" to hold up some really cool "X" crossing, or if your theme had been "X"-related, then fine, it's a thing in the world, I can tolerate its presence, but only if it seems to be supporting something bigger and more wonderful. Here, it's not. So we get to contemplate online harassment ... for no good reason. Pass.


After the early abundance of "?" clues, there wasn't much more to slow me down. Clues were not always transparent, but I didn't get stuck or even noticeably slowed down at any point. I did have to pause at the classic kealoa*, ABIT v. ATAD (39D: Somewhat), but other than that perfectly ordinary obstacle, no trouble spots. See you tomorrow.

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld 

*kealoa = short, common answer that you can't just fill in quickly because two or more answers are viable, Even With One or More Letters In Place. From the classic [Mauna ___] KEA/LOA conundrum. See also, e.g. [Heaps] ATON/ALOT, ["Git!"] "SHOO"/"SCAT," etc.

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

One-named former wrestler who twice won the W.W.E. Divas Championship / THU 6-9-22 / Hip-hop subgenre in Lil Nas X's Old Town Road / Creatures whose saliva acts as a blood thinner / Italian sportswear brand named after a Greek letter / Some sleeveless undergarments informally / E-commerce site with a portmanteau name / One wearing a traje de luces suit of light in the ring

$
0
0
Constructor: Dan Ziring

Relative difficulty: Easy-Medium


THEME: SHORT / FILMS (37A: With 39-Across, some Sundance submissions ... or a hint to four squares in this puzzle) — a rebus puzzle where four films with short *titles* are smushed into four squares throughout the grid:

Theme answers (movie titles in red):
  • ARETHA / MEET-CUTES ("E.T") (17A: "Queen" of 40-Down / 3D: Rom-com staples)
  • RADIO EDITS / AHI TUNA ("It") (18A: CeeLo Green's "Forget You" and the Black Eyed Peas'"Don't Mess With My Heart")
  • SUPERSTORM / GROUPON ("Up") (61A: Increasingly common weather event akin to a hurricane / 47D: E-commerce site with a portmanteau name)
  • PC USER / SOUL MUSIC ("Us") (63A: One with Windows / 40D: Otis Redding's genre)
Word of the Day: "Us" (see 63A / 40D) —

Us
 is a 2019 American horror film written and directed by Jordan Peele, starring Lupita Nyong'oWinston DukeElisabeth Moss, and Tim Heidecker. The film follows Adelaide Wilson (Nyong'o) and her family, who are attacked by a group of menacing doppelgängers. [...] Us had its world premiere at South by Southwest on March 8, 2019, and was theatrically released in the United States on March 22, 2019, by Universal Pictures. It was a critical and commercial success, grossing $255 million worldwide against a budget of $20 million, and received praise for Peele's screenplay and direction, Nyong'o's performance, and Michael Abels' musical score. (wikipedia)
• • •

Really hard not to like this one, but I found a way. Kidding! It was fun, even if the theme was exceedingly easy to pick up. Maybe it was fun *because* the theme was easy to pick up—with some theme concepts, you pick them up and then it's just a dreary march to the end, finding more of the same things you've already found, or performing more of the same "wordplay," or whatever. But SHORT / FILMS!? Sign me up. That is an Easter egg hunt I am happy to go on. If the concept is interesting, then I am happy to go tiptoeing through the rebus minefield, waiting for the completely non-violent and delightful explosions. I still say the late-week puzzles are being excessively defanged, presumably in the interests of being solvable by a broader chunk of the paying public (a motivation which *sounds* noble, but is entirely about $$$). I would like my late-week puzzles to push me around a little, in a fun, consensual way. And this one didn't. But it made up for it with the high entertainment value of the content. I liked that there were other film-related answers in the grid, including one that contained one of the SHORT / FILMS in question (MEET-CUTES). There's also Irene DUNNE (legend—more than just a crossword answer, kids!) and Oscar-winner Rami MALEK (54A: Best Actor winner for "Bohemian Rhapsody"), whose name I managed to spell right on the first try today. And I just spelled his first name right too! I know there is a publisher called TOR, after the [Craggy peak] of crossword fame, but is there a movie, or anything movie-related, called "TOR"? Reason I ask ... 
  • TORT
  • TORTA
  • TORAHS
  • TORERO
  • SUPERSTORM
  • AERATOR
You can also see it backwards in PROTÉGÉ. If you solve long enough, the puzzles will start whispering to you, and then eventually you whisper back, and it's a whole thing. If you're a novice solver, I would say "get out (!) while you can," or at least "never solve more than one puzzle a day"), but you're gonna do what you're gonna do, and honestly, if this is how my Crazy manifests—seeing things in grids that quote-unquote "aren't there," ascribing significance to coincidental letter strings—then I'm OK with that. Congrats to this puzzle for its bite-sized pleasures, and for managing to cram Fritz Lang's "M" into the grid a full seven times! Now that's what I call a bonus answer!


CAMIS ICH SHAHS LEECH—that's how I started, without hesitation, and I was off like a shot. Before long, I had found the first rebus square ("ET tu, rebus!?") and then found my way straight to the heart of the grid, where the reason for the "ET" square was revealed. 


To my great joy, that first rebus square had nothing to do with Latin, and while it did have to do with aliens, I wasn't staring at the prospect of having to find 3-to-god-knows-how-many more "ET"s in my grid. I was, instead, on a short (-titled) film hunt. The game was afoot and I was all deerstalker-capped, magnifying-glassed, tobacco-piped, houndstooth Inverness-caped and ready to go. But at first, and for a long time, no movies turned up. I got this far before the lack of movies got suspicious, so I stopped to take a screenshot:


What I wanted to say was "How have I gotten this deep into the puzzle without encountering a second movie squares!?" But it turns out I already had encountered said square. If I'd realized that  18A: CeeLo Green's "Forget You" and the Black Eyed Peas'"Don't Mess With My Heart" was asking for a plural and not a singular, I would've found the clown hiding under the sewer grate or whatever the hell happens in "It." The remaining movies came pretty easily. Well, "Us" very easily (what else was gonna follow SOUL but MUSIC?). "Up" was a little tougher, since I didn't remember that SUPER was a kind of STORM, so I had to back into that corner via SORORAL (a word my software is angrily red-underlining), and then sort things out from there. IRATE TORTA ENYA, the end.


Notes:
  • 56A: Grist for a mill (LOG)— sincerely, probably the hardest thing in the grid, for me. I had LO- and no idea what was going on. "Grist" had me thinking of grains, for some reason (anagram of "grits"?!). Huge tree parts ... never thought of them as grist. Clearly I don't spend a lot of time thinking about grist.
  • 10D: What Britain left in 2020, in brief (THEEU)— I love this answer because it just looks so incredibly stupid in the grid. It looks like a minor Lovecraftian monster—maybe something Chthulu feeds upon. THEEU! Anyway, this and PCUSER were today's minor parsing challenges. 
  • 69A: Genderqueer identity (ENBY)— Nonbinary => N.B. => ENBY. I don't think this is the first time we've seen the term (my memory is correct—we saw it in the plural (ENBIES) back in January). 
  • 60A: Underground N.Y.C. group (MTA)— that's the Metropolitan Transit Authority. In charge of the subway, which is "Underground," don't ya know...
  • 22D: Ridiculous introduction? (UTTERLY)— I like this clue a lot, though it is UTTERLY ridiculous that there are so many -LY-ending adverbs in this puzzle (see also BARELY, SLIMLY). OK, not UTTERLY. OK, not ridiculous at all. Just remarkable. Not as remarkable as this puzzle's mysterious TOR-storm, but remarkable nonetheless.
Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

Parisian sweets? / FRI 6-10-22 / Blogroll assortment / Root vegetable with stringy stalks / Scientist for whom a part of the brain is named / Common condiment with fajitas

$
0
0
Constructor: Blake Slonecker

Relative difficulty: Medium-Challenging


THEME: none 

Word of the Day: Pierre Paul BROCA (42A: Scientist for whom a part of the brain is named) —
Pierre Paul Broca (/ˈbrkə/, also UK/ˈbrɒkə/US/ˈbrkɑː/, French: [pɔl bʁɔka]; 28 June 1824 – 9 July 1880) was a French physician, anatomist and anthropologist. He is best known for his research on Broca's area, a region of the frontal lobe that is named after him. Broca's area is involved with language. His work revealed that the brains of patients with aphasia contained lesions in a particular part of the cortex, in the left frontal region. This was the first anatomical proof of localization of brain function. Broca's work also contributed to the development of physical anthropology, advancing the science of anthropometry.
• • •

I have been complaining (a bit) that the late-week puzzles don't really have much TEETH any more (by which I meant BITE, I think, not [Show of authority, metaphorically]). So you'd think a Friday clued somewhat more toughly than usual would bring me joy—and it might, in theory, but this ain't it. No flow. No zoom. No real marquee fill that I can see. It all just feels rather flat. I think we're supposed to be impressed that there is a longish triple-stack crossing *another* long triple stack of equal dimensions. And now I'm noticing something else that we're probably supposed to OOH at—that is, that the symmetry isn't just 180-degree rotational (typical), it's actually 90-degree rotational (black squares stay in the same place with every 90-degree rotation). So though its grid structure is not exactly flashy, what we have here is a low-key architectural stunt with very little going on at the level of content. The fill was fine, it just wasn't exciting, and the cluing didn't help much. In short, instead of the zoom-zoom whoosh-whoosh experience I look forward to on Fridays, I got something of a slog. An inert hunk of words that has the external appearance of a Friday crossword, but none of the excitement. 


Ironically, the hardest part of the grid for me was, in fact, TEETH. Not because I couldn't understand TEETH, but because I couldn't understand the apparent plural in 2D: Parisian sweets? (CHERIE), which I had rendered as CHERIS, reasoning that if "my sweet" is one person, well then "sweets" is more than one. My dear ones, mes CHERIS, makes sense, moving on ... unfortunately, what I was moving on to was TSETH. And yes, that is a nonsense "word," but the whole "metaphorically" part had me thinking maybe it was some modern slang I didn't know, or something like that (is it a one-syllable exclamation, like "TSETH!," or ... rapper named Seth trying to style himself after T-Pain? I was prepared to believe many things). I had SHORE and actually wanted TEETH at some point, but pulled both out when CHERIS made that whole section seemingly impossible. I also forgot the last letters of the [Root vegetable with stringy stalks]. CELERITY? No. CELERIUM? No. CELERI...AN? No, you're thinking of Valerian. I literally just now *already* forgot CELERIAC, so improbable do its last letter seem to me (seriously, I tried to recall the correct answer without reconsulting the grid sitting on the desk just to my left: failure). CELERIAC sounds like something rabid celery fans might call themselves. After these NW troubles, the puzzle just sort of chugged along at a somewhat slower than usual rate, though the SW went down like a Tuesday and the SE like a Monday, so I guess I can add "very uneven in terms of difficulty" to the list of less-than-ideal features. I had BARGING INTO before INON (and I wanted BURSTING -something earlier in the solve, when I thought it was CELERIUM). COUNTERACTS also gave me some trouble since I didn't have the first letter (that CELERIAC really did a lot of damage). No other errors of note. 

[please replace "Valerie" w/ "Celery," thank you]

Bullets:
  • 10D: Some customer service agents nowadays (CHATBOTS) — this is one of the two answers that feel most fresh and modern in this puzzle, but since CHATBOTS are such a dreary and depressing and dehumanizing part of life, I can't say I'm too thrilled to run into them here.
  • 15A: "Sounds good, but ... huh-uh" ("YEAH, NO") — this is the fill winner today, by a country mile. A perfect, common, apparently self-contradictory colloquialism. I say some version of it all the time. I love when the puzzle captures weird quirks of speech like this.
  • 29A: Like Gen-Z fans of classic rock, seemingly (BORN TOO LATE) — this whole concept doesn't really have the resonance it might have at some pre-internet, pre-streaming, pre-universal music access point. If you're 20 and want to listen to classic rock, it's easily accessible. It's everywhere. OK, your friends aren't into it, maybe, but so much of being young is in fact veering away from the crowd, or trying to. Anyway, BORN TOO LATE implies you're missing out on something, and while you might wish you had been alive to be part of some scene (to have experienced Woodstock, or, I dunno, peak mall culture), the music itself is ubiquitous. You live in an age where you don't even have to *try* to find out about it and listen to it. There it is. In abundance. 
  • 22A: Blogroll assortment (SITES)— the very word "blogroll" feels like it's covered in cobwebs, or, like, moldering in a weedy and overgrown field somewhere. Blog culture peaked somewhere in the late '00s, and I honestly haven't thought of this term since ... well, maybe since they got rid of Google Reader. Usually, if you have a list of SITES in your sidebar, you've given them some more meaningful thematic label.
  • 1A: Puzzling start? (ACROSS)— I don't get it. Yes, I "start"ed with this clue, which is an ACROSS clue, but I don't get how ACROSS is a "start," necessarily. At all. I thought this answer was going to be a prefix at first. But no. This is an awfully forced "?" clue. I don't even know what kind of wordplay they were going for. I often "start" with the Downs, if the first ACROSSes are all really long. Sigh. "?" clues should make sense! [Puzzling start?] is a good clue for PEE and that's about it.
Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld 

P.S. "Key & PEELE" was a hit sketch comedy show, hence 8D: Key partner? (PEELE). Jordan PEELE, Keegan-Michael Key.

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

Wrapping weights / SAT 6-11-22 / Banned backyard game / Ruler chosen through Islamic process of Shura / Certain crossbred lapdog / Travel aid in science fiction / Queen Wheat City / Vehicles in the Phantom Menace / Ironic word before an expletive / Drink with dry vermouth paradoxically / Authority in the field informally / NBA general manager Brand

$
0
0
Constructor: Sid Sivakumar

Relative difficulty: Medium


THEME: none 

Word of the Day:
Noomi RAPACE (37D: Noomi ___, lead actress of 2009's "The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo") —
Noomi Rapace (Swedish: [ˈnǒːmɪ raˈpasː] née Norén; born 28 December 1979) is a Swedish actress. She achieved international fame with her portrayal of Lisbeth Salander in the Swedish film adaptations of the Millennium seriesThe Girl with the Dragon TattooThe Girl Who Played with Fire, and The Girl Who Kicked the Hornets' Nest. In 2010, she was nominated for a BAFTA Award for Best Actress for her performance in The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, and for an International Emmy Award for Best Actress for the miniseries version of the trilogy. She has also starred as Anna in Daisy Diamond (2007), Leena in Beyond (2010), Anna in The Monitor (2011), Madame Simza Heron in Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows (2011), Elizabeth Shaw in Prometheus (2012), Beatrice in Dead Man Down (2013), Nadia in The Drop (2014), Raisa Demidova in Child 44 (2015), and the seven lead roles in What Happened to Monday(2017). (wikipedia)
• • •

A properly tough Saturday, somewhat more interesting than yesterday's puzzle, but I still don't really see much in the way of marquee fill or exciting seed entries. Usually you start a themeless with some cooler longer entries that you want to use, and build around them, and so when I don't see a handful of real sizzlers on a Friday or Saturday, I wonder what the point was, aside from competently filling in a 72-entries-or-less grid. The only answer that really got my attention (in a good way) was "WHO CAN SAY?!," which has that colloquial tang I'm always a sucker for. WET MARTINI would've been lovely but the clue on it was so awful that the answer was ruined for me (46A: Drink with dry vermouth, paradoxically). Hey, you know what is also a [Drink with dry vermouth]? A DRY MARTINI. The wetness of a WET MARTINI is not a result of the ingredient per se, as the clue implies, but is instead just a matter of proportion (WET MARTINIs simply have more vermouth). You could have done something with the irony of a drink's getting wetter by adding more of something dry, but the clue makes zero reference to proportion (which, again, is the CORE issue in a WET MARTINI), and so the whole thing is a hard fail. Paradox, shmaradox; a fine answer spoiled. Maybe solvers got excited by POD RACERS? (23A: Vehicles in "The Phantom Menace"). Not this solver. Ditto MEAT CASES (9D: Some supermarket displays). SHAPEWEAR actually seems like a freshish entry (13A: Some spandex garments). It's not showy, but it's part of the sartorial spectrum that I don't think has been represented much in the grid. I'm having trouble imagining a HIGH STEP that doesn't involve show horses or maybe a ... what's that person who leads a marching band called? Ah, drum major, right. Maybe those in fact are the desired referents (33A: Walk or run in a showy way). That answer has a little flash. But while all these answers fit together nicely, and there are no weak or off-putting parts of the grid, as a whole it still felt a little flat. Lacking in high points. Which I guess is what "flat" means. So there you go.


The names seem like things that could've really tripped solvers up. I know LUPE Fiasco and ELTON Brand pretty well, so those didn't get me, but Noomi RAPACE definitely got me despite the fact that I literally looked her up earlier this week. My wife was solving one of Joon Pahk's excellent Rows Garden puzzles and they involve a lot of six-letter words arranged in a circular pattern—these are the "roses" in the garden (there are also literal straight "rows" that run through said "roses," which are clued separately, but I digress...). She finished the puzzle but couldn't match one of the completed "roses" with the clues on the list. It was an actress clue. So I tried to parse RAPACE from the circular arrangement of letters, and having wondered aloud "is RAPACE someone?" my wife then looked her up. And sure enough, she's a reasonably successful actress who has been in ... I want to say absolutely nothing that I've ever seen. She somehow has managed to get through my movie radar completely (I watch 350+ movies a year since the pandemic, though admittedly most of them have been from last century). So I learned her name from a puzzle and completely and utterly forgot it three days later when I needed it. Does not bode well for my senior-year solving. Oh well. I managed. With crosses. As one does.


Notes:
  • 19A: "Weird ..." ("IT'S ODD...")— had "HOW ODD..." at first. "Weird" means "odd," so I don't love the clue / phrase correspondence here (no accounting for "IT'S"), but the phrases do mean roughly the same thing, so whatever.
  • 7D: Authority in the field, informally (REF)— anything might be a REFerence. Capital "A" Authority not actually required. Again, not sure what the clues are trying to do today. [I'm being told this clue is referring (!) to a REFeree. Ah, *that* "field." Got it. That makes much more sense.]
  • 20A: Button on a Facebook post (REACTION) — really trying to stay off Facebook, which is, in general, both cesspool and timesuck. I thought this would be an actual button, but it's just a broad category of button. The "button" on my FB is just "Like," which you hover over in order to see REACTION options. Which are also "buttons"? OK.
  • 25D: One side of a fast-food restaurant (COLESLAW) — "of" is doing a loooooooooot of work here. "In" or "at" are way, way more apt, but then you wouldn't get misdirected (as I def. was), so sure, "of."
  • 17D: Study buds? (EAR PLUGS) — I work at a University and you know what students have in their ears when they are "study"ing (and seemingly all other times). Ear Buds. That was all I could think of. To me, EAR PLUGS are for concerts. But apparently there's also a whole ear plug industry aimed at students. I did not know this.
  • 26A: Ollas, e.g. (STEW POTS) — embarrassingly confused my crosswordese here and imagined an OAST, not an Olla ... and therefore was looking for some kind of ... oven, I think. I knew Ollas were for food, but, yeah, just glitched on how they were for food.
  • 43A: Willingness to listen (OPEN EARS)— well I didn't want EARS for (glaringly) obvious reasons. I wanted OPENNESS. Because "EAR," as we've seen, is Already In The Grid. A truly bizarre and unfortunate dupe.
  • 38D: Wrapping weights (TARES) — i.e. the weight of the wrapping (or other container). When you're trying to measure the weight of something, you don't want to measure its "wrapping," so you correct for the weight of the wrapping—that's the tare weight. TARES are also injurious weeds in the Bible, but only if you're solving a puzzle circa 1978. Seriously, Shortz ditched that [Biblical weed] clue as soon as he took over (~1994) and it hasn't been heard from since (last appearance: Aug., 1993).
  • 41D: Banned backyard game (JARTS)— oh to have grown up in a time of great backyard danger! Wait a second, I did grow up in that time! It was great! I mean, if you ignore the impaled body parts! Great, I say! JARTS are a brand of lawn darts. The game has largely been superseded by Cornhole (at least in these parts).
Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

Composer Luigi who pioneered noise music / SUN 6-12-22 / Chemical ingredient in flubber / Rock's CJ or Dee Dee / Former name for the NBA's Thunder informally / Goldman who crusaded for birth control access / Monocle-dropping exclamation

$
0
0
Constructor: Will Nediger

Relative difficulty: Easy


THEME:"Didn't We Just Have This?"— words appear in the grid, and then get referred to in entries that refer to said words appearing ... again:

Theme answers:
  • "... AND ANOTHER THING" (27A: Argument extender [ref. 18-Across]) (18A = THING)
  • "THIS ISN'T MY / FIRST RODEO" (48A: With 87-Across, "I've been around the block a few times" [ref. 23-Across]) (23A = RODEO)
  • "IT'S DEJA VU ALL OVER AGAIN" (70A: Classic Yogi Berra quote [ref. 33-Across]) (33A = DEJA VU)
  • "BABY ONE MORE TIME" (111A: Debut album by Britney Spears [ref. 82-Across]) (82A = BABY)

Word of the Day:
UNROLLED (91A: Consolidated for easier reading, as a Twitter thread) —

The beauty of Twitter is that every message is constrained to 280 characters and under, but sometimes you simply can’t get all your thoughts across in just a single tweet. Or perhaps you’re following a live news story and you need to follow the thread to read the news as it develops so there’s context for what happened earlier.

Whatever the reason, sometimes Twitter threads can get long, which can make them difficult to follow. Thankfully, there’s a bot that can help piece those tweets together into one piece of text without all the extra replies from anyone other than the person who originally started the thread. This is called “unrolling” a thread, and it’s created by a tool called @threadreaderapp, which lets you combine tweetstorms into one single post simply by using the keyword “unroll.” (theverge.com)

• • •

I can't say this isn't a cute joke but it ends up making the puzzle so easy that it ends up being not much of a puzzle, to be honest. Also, there are just four themers, and with thematic content that light, I'd expect a much brighter and more vibrant grid than what we end up getting. The only non-theme answers that really struck me as interesting were two proper nouns that briefly sent me into "holy crap, please don't let any of these crosses fail, please" mode (AYOTOMETI, RUSSOLO). I thank those names for giving me some genuine excitement, even if that excitement was basically Failure Terror. Nothing else in the grid was that thrilling, although, again, I'll grant you that the basic thematic premise is kind of funny. It's especially funny to run this puzzle directly after a puzzle that also duplicated a word (EAR), but with absolutely no self-awareness or humor. And yet this theme was all too thin and simple to satisfy on a Sunday-sized canvas. "IT'S DEJA VU ALL OVER AGAIN" is a perfect, grid-spanning 21 letters long, and it seems a wonderful phrase to build a puzzle around. I just wish there'd been more places for this concept to go, or that this particular execution of the concept hadn't made too much of this puzzle too obvious too quickly. Look how fast I got the theme:


And not just the first theme answer, but the whole dang theme concept:


Maybe if both THING and RODEO hadn't both been in a solver's most likely starting point (i.e. the NW), things would've been a tiny bit tougher, and maybe that would've made the solve a little more satisfying, I don't know. Also, maybe if the theme clues had found some (much) more elegant way of handling the cross-references than just plunking them down in aggressively straightforward, workmanlike, non-wordplay fashion, i.e. in brackets with instructions that are roughly the equivalent of "just go look at this other answer"—maybe that would've provided the elegance, the oomph, that this puzzle seemed to lack. Promising concept, fizzling execution, not much grid spice to offset the thematic thinness. That was how things looked from where I was solving. I do want to praise [Monocle-dropping exclamation], which is a hilariously specific and vivid clue for "I SAY!"


Buncha stuff I did not know today. For instance COCO Palm, which sounds like a stage name, not a tree name (5A: ___ palm (tropical tree)). If you'd told me the tree was a COCOA palm, well, I wouldn't have known that either, but it definitely would've felt more plausible. Also, been eating doughnuts (donuts?) and other pastry for half a century-ish and somehow never heard of a LONGJOHN (12D: Doughnut similar to an éclair). Put an "S" on the end of that LONGJOHN, and then it's something I'm plenty familiar with. But in the singular, doughnut form: new to me. I had RIALS before RIYAL (57A: Currency of Qatar) because RIAL is the name of the currency of lots and lots of places (hmm, apparently just three places (Iran, Yemen, Oman), but ... it feels like a lot, is what I'm saying). Qatar puts a "Y" in there for some reason. More international currency things for me to learn and then forget! Non-human primates don't have CHINs??? (25A: Body part that humans have that other primates don't). Also, not a thing I knew. I would've thought any creature with a jawbone technically had a CHIN, but apparently not. Thought flubber might've been made out of BORON (76A: Chemical ingredient in flubber = BORAX), and that the alleged 2018 legal drama might then have been called "On the Basis of SIN" (66D: "On the Basis of ___" (2018 legal drama) = SEX), so that was a fun little alternate-universe diversion. I don't have anything else marked on my puzzle, so I guess I'm done. 


Time once again for ...

Letters to the Editor

No new topics in my Letters to the Editor this week, but a few letters did harken back to the subject of the first letter I published a few weeks back by Gene Weingarten—the question of what fill, if any, should be off-limits in a crossword puzzle (read Gene's original letter here, and a few reader responses from the following week here). Several writers this week shared Gene's (mostly) anything-goes attitude toward crossword fill, and (implicitly or explicitly) dismissed "sensitivity" as a valid concern. Toby S. writes:
I think we’re of a similar age/era (I was b. in ‘68) and so I have a hard time believing that men of our era do not have the ‘…but words will never hurt me’ ethos burned into your (our) lizard brainstem. Yes, I get the idea that certain names and phrases have the power to turn on the horror movie projector inside one’s mind. But…as Gene gets at, it is just a crossword puzzle, reflecting the world as it is. Such clues / words do. not. imply. approval. They just don’t. So why do you let them ‘take up residence’ in your mind even for a moment? Has this always been your ‘human response’ or is it possible that over time your internal algorithm has noticed that the fussier you comment the more emails / comments you get?
And Julian Rosenblum basically agrees:
I don’t think being included as part of a crossword puzzle’s fill is inherently much of a pedestal. If it were, we’d probably have far more statues of ERNEs and WRENs. Filling a crossword puzzle is not easy. I doubt that someone writing a puzzle is thinking, you know what this thing really needs? Phlegm. That’s just not how those words come to be part of the puzzle. And it would be a shame to reject someone’s beautifully constructed puzzle because it required them to incorporate a word that some people find mildly distasteful.

There are absolutely certain words that should not appear in a crossword (racial slurs, for example), but I think the criteria for being, let’s call it, de-worded, should be very high.

I also posit that Elon Musk, self-proclaimed champion of free speech, would be elated to know that a bunch of pearl-clutching liberals are trying to remove his name from the New York Times crossword puzzle. Plays right into his hand.
Allison Hughes, however, has a much different take on the issue:

I think there’s value in thinking about why some people have a strong reaction to certain words, and some people have no reaction. Please excuse me, but I’m going to use Trump as an example, because that is a name that I personally have a reaction to.


When I say “reaction”, I mean hearing his name evokes a feeling in me. When I hear the word “Trump”, I think of that moment during his campaign when he bragged about repeatedly sexually assaulting women. I am a woman. 


There are multiple layers to my feelings. First are the feelings that I would have if any person on earth bragged of hurting women simply because they are women. Of hurting me just because they can. I feel helpless, despairing, sad, and pessimistic [...]


I don’t want to see the word Trump in the crossword because I don’t want to feel all of those feelings his name evokes. Presumably you have similar reasons or feelings as to why you don’t want to see his name in the crossword as well.


I’m sure there are people out there who feel happiness at the thought of women having fewer rights or being assaulted, and presumably those people want to see Trump’s name more often in the crossword. But what of these people who feel neutral about his name? Those who say that Trump is simply “one of 46 presidents of the United States”. This is a fact, they say, and facts are neutral.


What a blessing to see his name and not feel sad or anxious. What a blessing it is to not worry about your future equality. What a blessing it is to not think about being intentionally hurt because of an intrinsic part of your existence.

B.K.S. Fisher isn't troubled by unpleasant people or topics in the crossword, but would like us to consider the premium some solvers put on "currency" (or "recency" or "contemporariness" in crossword fill), particularly when that push for currency involves the denigration of the "old":

I have a broad tolerance for the words, people, organizations and events that land in my crossword puzzle.  I may grimace or shake my head at certain clues or certain answers, but it’s a reaction of the moment which colors no more than 15 seconds of my day.  These things exist (or existed) in the world in which I live, and I don’t expect the crossword to be walled off from them.  It’s a learning experience when something I know little or nothing about provokes a strong negative reaction from you or the people who comment on this site.  I look it up with as much interest as I would something positive or neutral.  That said, hate-speech has no place in this or any forum.  I want pleasure from my crossword puzzle just as much as the next person.  But I don’t find that references to the unpleasant detract from my enjoyment in any significant way.  Moreover, I find no reason to gripe when someone else takes offense at something I don’t.  We all have our sensibilities and I’m disinclined to call anyone a prude or a pearl-clutcher.

In my mind, this question of crossword suitability based on propriety dovetails with the question of suitability based on currency.  In both cases, the issue is what individuals and which aspects of the human endeavor are to be considered crossword-appropriate.  It seems the dudgeon can climb just as high for older references as for mucus, McConnell and Musk.  I think that history offers a rich trove of material for puzzles, and I don’t just mean our friends Tut and Homer.  A few months ago, one of the stars of the silent-movie era, Theda Bara, appeared in a puzzle.  When commenters complained about her being decades out of date, I didn’t know whether to laugh or groan (and did both).  Out of date!  Of course, she’s out of date!  She’s part of the very beginning of the history of Hollywood, a history which has taken us from the Kinetograph to digital cinema, and from the antics of the Keystone Kops to sophisticated explorations of the human heart and mind.  For Theda Bara’s particular legacy, I refer you to Rita Hayworth (Gilda), Kathleen Turner (Body Heat) and Rosamund Pike (Gone Girl).  I understand that solvers don’t want their puzzles laden with historical fact at the expense of current references.  I, too, want a balance.  But it’s too prescriptive to require each puzzle to strike parity with the age of its references.  And I regret the growing tendency to see history, within the solving community and without, as random occurrences with no contemporary relevance, rather than as “a chronological record of significant events” (Merriam-Webster) which informs every aspect of our lived reality.  

Thanks for the letters. Feel free to write me about anything crossword-related that you'd like to get off your chest (rexparker at icloud dot com). Be sure to mark any letters "OK TO PRINT." Please try to keep future letters to 300 words or less, just so I can accommodate several of them if I need to. Thanks so much,

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

Believer in Islamic mysticism / MON 6-13-22 / French peak / Princess played by Emma Corrin on The Crown / Andean herd animal / Three-point driving maneuver / Spotted wildcats of the South American jungle / India's smallest state

$
0
0
Constructor: Hoang-Kim Vu and Jessica Zetzman

Relative difficulty: normal Monday


THEME: JUMP SUITS (58A: Garments similar to rompers ... with a hint to the shaded squares in this puzzle) — circled ("shaded" in your grid, maybe) squares spell out the "suits" in a card deck, and these "suits""jump" up one row somewhere mid-word:

Theme answers:
  • there are none (just look at the grid)
Word of the Day: JIB (58D: Triangular sail) —
jib is a triangular sail that sets ahead of the foremast of a sailing vessel. Its tack is fixed to the bowsprit, to the bows, or to the deck between the bowsprit and the foremost mast. Jibs and spinnakers are the two main types of headsails on a modern boat. (wikipedia)
• • •

Basically a very easy themeless, but without the openness and wonderful fill that a true themeless generally brings. So, an easy and fairly boring themeless that is super-duper reliant on the revealer to stick the landing—you need it to be perfect to make the total lack of genuine theme answers seem worth it. But the landing is not great. Shaky. The suits do jump, but they are ... jumping suits, not jump suits. The phrase just doesn't hit the mark. Yes, I get it, we all get, but this is not a horseshoes / hand grenades situation. Close isn't good enough. You really need le revealer juste here, and JUMP SUITS just wobbles. It's one where you squint a little and go "ok, yeah, I SEE," but this theme needs its revealer to have a much bigger impact. The "suits" restrict the fill the way a normal theme would, but they don't give you any theme content. So you get all the fill compromises and none of the theme pleasure. It doesn't add up. Also, the fill could be better all over, particularly in that northern section. ALPE really has no place in an easy-to-fill Monday puzzle (15A: French peak). It's a very rough foreignism, the kind you only wanna trot out if you're desperate to hold something amazing in place. And that desperation just isn't called for here. I redid this section a bunch of ways—WAILS can go to WAITS if you need, LAPELS to all kinds of stuff, like INPUTS and REPELS and IMPELS etc. I didn't *love* any of my quickly de-ALPE'd efforts, but they were definite improvements *and* in every case I also managed to DITCH the incredibly depressing (as clued) BEACHED (21A: Stuck ashore, as a whale). And I wasn't even using software. Unbeach the whale, de-ALPE the puzzle, make everything cleaner and nicer, it's very possible. 


I have "no no no" as well as "LOL" written next to K-TURN, what is happening!? (61A: Three-point driving maneuver). It's a three-point turn. That's what it's called. It's always been a three-point turn. It doesn't need new names. How hard is it to say "three-point turn"? You did not need to bring a letter into the mix. Three-point turn is easy to understand and more accurately describes what's happening with the maneuver. K-TURN, what in the world? That sounds like a bad drug reaction. Like when you take "K" (short for Ketamine, I believe) and things take a very bad "turn"—like maybe you fall into a K-HOLE (an actual term, not making it up, I swear). Anyway, U-TURN would've worked fine here (the UFC is very much a thing), and I'd rather see K-HOLE in my grid than K-TURN. Actually, scratch that, K-HOLEs sound scary. But at least K-HOLE is not a fake name for a thing that already has a perfectly good name. My god, when I search [define k turn] the first hit I get is literally titled "Three-point turn," perhaps because That Is The Correct Name For It. Sigh. 


Notes:
  • 28A: Dirty dozen? (BAD EGGS)— this term is slang for bad people, not a term describing actual  rotten eggs (that term, funnily enough, is "rotten eggs"). So the cutesy clue kinda misses here.
  • 6D: Big flaps in the fashion industry? (LAPELS) — Again, I want to like the "?" clue, but they're just flaps. LAPELS aren't inherently big. Like, in relation to what? Some LAPELS are big, but ... maybe specify the era? [Big flaps in '70s fashion?]. The internet is telling me that "the '30s and the '70s featured exceptionally wide LAPELS." Seems like that information could've been useful here.
  • 34A: India's smallest state (GOA)— this was my favorite part of the puzzle, because I misread the clue as [India's smallest snake] and then, verrrrry reluctantly, wrote in BOA, thinking, "man ... how big *are* Indian snakes!!?"
Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

Late singer with a food name / TUE 6-14-22 / Ocean invertebrate with a round translucent body / Plains figure replaced by Monticello on U.S. nickels / Book-loving Disney princess in a yellow gown / Hot dish that sounds cold / Community card between flop and river in hold'em

$
0
0
Constructor: Robert Won

Relative difficulty: Easy

[forgot to take screenshot of finished grid before I closed puzzle, so rather
than type it all back in, I just hit "Reveal All," which puts accusing little eyeballs in 
every revealed square, my apologies]

THEME: ROCK AND ROLL (56A: Genre with a Hall of Fame in Cleveland ... or what can follow the respective halves of 17-, 33- and 40-Across) — two-word (or -part) theme answers where first part of the answer can follow ROCK and second part the second can follow ROLL in familiar phrases:

Theme answers:
  • BLACK COFFEE (17A: Easy order for a barista) (Black Rock, coffee roll)
  • BEDSPRING (33A: Coil in a mattress) (bedrock, spring roll)
  • MOON JELLY (40A: Ocean invertebrate with a round, translucent body) (moon rock, jellyroll)
Word of the Day: BlackRock (see 17-Across) —

BlackRock, Inc. is an American multinational investment management corporation based in New York City. Founded in 1988, initially as a risk management and fixed income institutional asset manager, BlackRock is the world's largest asset manager, with US$10 trillion in assets under management as of January 2022. BlackRock operates globally with 70 offices in 30 countries and clients in 100 countries.

BlackRock has sought to position itself as an industry leader in environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG). The company has faced criticism for worsening climate change, its close ties with the Federal Reserve System during the COVID-19 pandemicanticompetitive behavior, and its unprecedented investments in China. (wikipedia)

• • •

Is that the right BlackRock, the asset management corporation? (see "Word of the Day," above). I mean, is that what I'm supposed to think of when I say "Black Rock" at the end of this puzzle, when I'm adding ROCK AND / or ROLL to all the theme answer parts? Because I had no idea this "asset manager" BlackRock was a thing. If you wanted to play the evil corporation in a cheesy Hollywood thriller, you could do worse than to call yourself BlackRock. It's like an off-the-cuff approximation of "Death Star" that was supposed to be a placeholder name but ended up sticking. It's depressing that I'm supposed to know the names of famous (?) "asset management corporations" in order to solve my Tuesday puzzle. But maybe this isn't the intended BlackRock. Maybe the intended Black Rock is the only Black Rock I actually know, the titular Black Rock from the glorious Technicolor (actually Eastman Color) 1955 Noir-Western, Bad Day at Black Rock, starring a gruff and redoubtable Spencer Tracy, and co-starring every tough guy who ever toughed his way through Tough Town, including Robert Ryan (King Bad Guy), Lee Marvin (Cool Bad Guy), and Ernest Borgnine (who I think won a Best Actor Academy Award for Marty that same year). Eddie Muller just screened Bad Day at Black Rock on TCM's "Noir Alley" a few weeks back. See it if you like trains, sunbaked landscapes, barely inhabited near-ghost towns, anti-racism message films, or lots of dudes just standing around laconically. Yes, this is the "Black Rock" that I will imagine this puzzle is referring to. Asset management, shmasset shmanagement. 


This is one of those "Both Halves"-type puzzles that you used to see more often. The concept is old, but this one puts something of a new twist on it by having "Both Halves" of the answers be able to follow not a single word (the most common variation) but two different words. The revealer's first word goes with first halves, and the second with second. That's an interesting variation on what can be a kind of dull theme. The trouble with this kind of theme is you walk a very narrow beam—there may be a lot of words that can follow "rock," and a lot of words that can follow "roll," but there are going to be Very Few phrases that you can make out of one word from column A and another from column B. It's tempting to try to come up with your own ... although maybe that's only true for NERDS. Anyway, for instance, ACID TEST might work if people were familiar enough with the concept of a "test roll" (from photography). How about PETSPIDER? I think that one is definitely viable, but it's hard to get a phrase that makes sense on its own *and* makes sense as parts of two other, different phrases—you're really working with three phrases for every one that appears in the grid. So there are only three themers in the grid, but there are six shadow answers floating behind it. I'm not sure it's the most rewarding kind of puzzle to solve, but it has construction complexity that might not be readily apparent to solvers.


Overall, the puzzle was very easy, with my only hesitations coming at COOL (was thinking actual cucumbers), BISON (I am numismatically challenged, I'll admit), and ORS (I wrote in IFS, which is definitely the less probable of those two options). Oh, and I needed a ton of crosses to remember the JELLY part of MOON JELLY. I liked that the puzzle was bookish today. Actually, I liked that the NERDS were bookish. So often they are more STEM-ish mathy techy nerds. Although maybe today's NERDS are "bookish" because they're reading software manuals, I don't know. But in my head, they are reading TSE's"The Wasteland" (literally me this week) and Shakespeare's Macbeth (32A) (me earlier in the year) and tales of Sherwood FOREST and maybe a bio of Toulouse-LAUTREC. We see the NERDS we are. Be the nerd you want to see in the world! Enjoy the rest of your day! Shout-out to BOONIES, which is a good answer! OK, I'm off to drink a whole damn pot of BLACK COFFEE, bye.

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld 

P.S. the fill could be much, much cleaner on this one. I promise you that you, yes you, can make a better NE corner than the one that's currently there (ABU ESS SLOE). You can get real words and familiar abbrs. in there instead of name parts and "feminine suffixes" and old-school crosswordese like SLOE. Here's a simple, clean version I cooked up quickly. Doable!



[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

Heroine Prior of the Divergent series / WED 6-15-22 / Epitome of slowness / Start of a punny quip with two correct answers / Where shampoo was invented / Come under fire literally or figuratively / Fictional character who dreams about Heffalumps

$
0
0
Constructor: Rob Baker

Relative difficulty: Medium-Challenging


THEME: a quip puzzle with an either/or square at the end... — the quip is "NOMATTER HOW MUCH / YOU / PUSH THE ENVELOPE / IT'S / STILL STATION(A/E)RY" (17A: Start of a punny quip with two correct answers

Word of the Day: LOU Rawls (11D: Singer Rawls) —
Louis Allen Rawls (December 1, 1933 – January 6, 2006) was an American record producer, singer, composer and actor. Rawls released more than 60 albums, sold more than 40 million records, and had numerous charting singles, most notably his song "You'll Never Find Another Love like Mine". He worked as a film, television, and voice actor. He was also a three-time Grammy-winner, all for Best Male R&B Vocal Performance. (wikipedia)

• • •

You can probably guess that this puzzle was not in any way shape or form for me. You couldn't invent a less for-me puzzle if you tried (please don't try). The one thing I will give this puzzle, from an originality point of view, is that it is a slight step up from your usual quip puzzle, at a structural / conceptual level, because of the ambiguous single square, which turns the the pun into a puzzle element instead of just leaving it sitting there sadly. Pun becomes Schrödinger square! I have to acknowledge that that is an original thing. I do not have to admit that I enjoyed that thing. Let me rephrase that. I could've enjoyed this pun, the way I "enjoy" any pun the puzzle throws at me. Maybe it's a groaner, maybe it's cute. The point is, it's a single pun, and, well, if the pun is part of the theme, then there will be other puns to move on to. But here, the entire (eeeeennnnntttttiiiiirrrrreeeee) puzzle rests on this one pun, which is to say a single square. Everything exists and is in the service of that one square. Which is to say, in this case, nearly all solving pleasure is sacrificed for that one square. Plus (worse), the puzzle ends up playing not only less pleasurable but tougher precisely because there are no theme answers. The quip parts don't have any punch. They are just doled out symmetrically to lead you to the end. And they are (or were, for me) much harder to pick up than theme answers because they don't have any answer integrity; that is, their clues are just [Here's more quip], which is to say they're essentially clueless, and they don't stand alone as phrases, so you have to work crosses like made just to make any grammatical sense of them. And then the crosses themselves of course aren't terribly lovely, for lots of reasons, not least of which is the fact that they are restricted and compromised by the damn quip. When I saw those largish 6x6-ish sections on the sides (E and W), I knew things were gonna get dicey in there. Short Downs up top and below, you can blow through those, but that middle part was way slower going. Anyway, it was a slog, for sure, and then I get to the big payoff, which I don't mind, actually. It's a cute little joke. But it doesn't feel like it should be asked to hold up An Entire Puzzle. The trip does not seem worth the destination. If the trip had been a lot more scenic, maybe. But that wasn't the case.


Just as it was predictable that I wasn't gonna love this one, it feels very predictable (to me) where the trouble spots were. First, COOLTO (25A: Aloof with), which, in addition to being one of the worst pieces of fill in the grid (imagine variants and you'll see how absurd COOLTO is ... KINDTO CRUELTO RUDETO GENEROUSTO ad inf.) was also deeply ambiguous. Which is to say I wrote in COLDTO. Not sure if that's the road less traveled there, but it Definitely made a difference. The "L" from COLD to immediately because LSATS in the cross (26D: Some exams). LIT OUT became absolutely impossible to see, and thus FERRIED remained mysterious as well (34A: Traveled to an island, say). I actually turned FANNIE Mae into SALLIE Mae at some point just to see if I could jolt that whole area into some kind of order (34D: ___ Mae (mortgage company)). Eventually, it all got settled, but ... lots of slog for no payoff (though LITOUT, in general, is a great 6-letter answer). Other predictable slowness: TRIS (47D: Heroine Prior of the "Divergent" series)."Divergent" already feels like part of a "teen trilogy" juggernaut / nightmare that washed over the world in the '00s and now is probably not behind us but feels behind me because my daughter finally grew out of that stuff. Anyway, actually knowing the names of characters involved in said trilogies? Unlikely. Also, in this case things were more difficult than they should've been because I kept reading "Prior" as a word, not a name ("'Heroine prior to the "Divergent" series?' What?"). But it's one answer, so I'm not mad at all. Just (predictably) shrugging. This clue made me miss TRIS Speaker clues, which used to roam the grid in large herds during the early Miocene era of crosswords (look him up! Hall-of-Fame, baby). 


Last predictable screw-up came at 41D: Come under fire, literally or figuratively (TAKE FLAK). Well, I thought they meant *literally* literally, so after TAKE, I threw down HEAT. If you put something literally "under fire" (so, broil it, I guess), then that thing ... takes heat. I mean, literally, it does. Sigh. TAKE ___ really got me, esp. alongside TRIS. Nothing else really caused trouble. It was just slow-going with very little joy along the way. This puzzle was a long walk ... through a place with no trees and lots of traffic ... culminating at a bench that's near a big tree that kind of looks like a yeti but also kind of like Abraham Lincoln. I mean, the tree is pretty cool to look at, I guess, but no way I'm taking that walk again.

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

Good or bad vacuum review / THU 6-16-22 / Eventgoers / One performing a palm print analysis / Trochee's counterpart / Facts First sloganeer / Setting for memorable cable car scene in Moonraker / Leads as a D&D campaign / Biblical patriarch with two-syllable name / That's a goldang lie! / Tree in the etymology of gin

$
0
0
Constructor: Parker Higgins and Ross Trudeau

Relative difficulty: Well, I thought it was Easy, but early social media response indicates otherwise, so who knows?


THEME: "That TTTTTTT Show" (i.e. "That 7 T's Show" i.e. "That '70s Show") — OK, that's not the theme, but that is an example of how this theme works: what *sounds* like an enumeration of letters (four N's, eight O's, two T's, ten D's, respectively) is represented in the grid by that Actual Number Of Letters. So:

Theme answers:
  • NNNNIC SCIENTIST = "forensic scientist" (NNNNIC => "four N's" + -IC => "forensic")
  • TOMOOOOOOOO = "tomatoes" (TOMOOOOOOOO =>  TOM + "eight O's" => "tomatoes")
  • CUTIE PATT = "cutie patooties" (PATT => PA- + "two Ts" => "patooties")
  • ADDDDDDDDDD = "attendees" (ADDDDDDDDDD => A- + "10 D's" => "attendees")
Word of the Day:"Moonraker" (54A: Setting for the memorable cable car scene in "Moonraker" => RIO) —
Moonraker is a 1979 spy-fi film, the eleventh in the James Bond series produced by Eon Productions, and the fourth to star Roger Moore as the fictional MI6 agent James Bond. The third and final film in the series to be directed by Lewis Gilbert, it co-stars Lois ChilesMichael LonsdaleCorinne Cléry, and Richard Kiel. Bond investigates the theft of a Space Shuttle, leading him to Hugo Drax, the owner of the Shuttle's manufacturing firm. Along with space scientist Dr. Holly Goodhead, Bond follows the trail from California to Venice, Rio de Janeiro, the Amazon rainforest, and finally into outer space to prevent a plot to wipe out the world population and to recreate humanity with a master race. (wikipedia)
• • •

Well I'm awake in the middle of the night because of the worst thunderstorm I've ever been in in my life. It's still happening, though the rain and lightning have abated a bit. At its worst, the sky was constant flashing, like God 's streetlights were flickering, and the lightning + thunder were pure assault. I'm awake. Wife's awake. Cats are ... god knows ... all over the house, looking at me like "Why?" So I thought I better sit down and solve the puzzle and post the blog quickly, before the power goes out. While these are perhaps not ideal conditions under which to solve a puzzle, this puzzle was So Good that conditions ceased to matter. In fact, maybe they helped. Maybe the puzzle felt even More delightful than it was because it took my mind off the menacing cacophony. Kind of impressive that the puzzle was able to do that, but the wackiness involved here is such loopy, gonzo, avant-garde, NTH-degree wackiness that I could not resist. I could only succumb to the vibe. I mean, I thought "wow, it takes a ton of courage to just go with eight damn O's in a row" ... and *then* I met the 10 T's. LOL. What a ride. And the grid shape made this solving experience extra-special. The whole thing felt alien, in the best possible way. The mirror symmetry, the stacked Acrosses up top, and especially the column of three 9s at the center bottom, all gave this a look and feel that took it way, way out of the ordinary. And yet not so far that it was undoable. It was, in fact, extremely doable, though I can see (online, already) that people are not grasping the theme concept as easily as I did, and are getting, let's say, frustrated. I completely sympathize with this feeling. And I'm very sorry you didn't grasp the concept in a more timely fashion, because it made the whole solving experience a joy.


I was on this puzzle's side from 1-Across (1A: Good or bad vacuum review? = "SUCKS!"). Yeah, I know it's kind of childish, but so am I, so there. Those four N's in the first themer came together very quickly, and the only way I could make sense of them was, it turns out, the right way. Just say the number of letters out loud! Only ... at that point, I thought it was more an equation-type dealie, where I was supposed to say 4N, i.e. "foreign." So I was trying to make the "palm print analysis" performer into some kind of "foreign" person ... I had to build the rest of that answer from back to front, and then look at it again. "What's a "foreign I.C. SCIENTIST!?" And then I saw it. Boom. Truly one of the most satisfying Aha moments of the year. What I really loved was that the next themer didn't just throw me more N's!  I wasn't paying close attention to how the theme clues were marked (with quotation marks, so you know that in order to be correct, the answer must be *spoken*). So I went into the "tomato" answer trying to make it work normally. And since I had CAN instead of MAO (45A: Repeated Warhol subject), I had trouble seeing the "O"-string clearly at first. But then the "O"s kept piling up and I thought "ah, it's tomato something!" But no, once you put in 8 O's, you're out of room. It's just "tomatoes." I can't believe someone turned "tomatoes" and "attendees" into fascinating theme answers. Highly unlikely scenario. And the two T's! So wee! So cute! You got these ostentatious letter strings on the side of the grid, and then tucked down there at the bottom, just two little T's ... inside an answer that is *about* cuteness. Ha ha, there is no part of this ridiculous theme that doesn't work. 


I had little bits of trouble here and there, but nothing out of the ordinary for a Thursday. LOL'd at the "goldang" in 9D: "That's a goldang lie!" ("AIN'T SO"). Is that how HICKS talk? (HICKS felt a little icky, in that it's got an elitist / derogatory tone to it, but that was the only part of the puzzle where my joy wobbled a little ... I guess I didn't mind "HICKS" so much because it's the name of one of my favorite TV shows ... oh wait, that's "HACKS" ... nevermind). Anyway, that "goldang" answer held me up for several goldang seconds because I couldn't figure out what kind of goldang HICKSpeak they were going for. Then I put Samantha Bee on TNT (sorry, Sam) (12D: "Full Frontal With Samantha Bee" airer) ... then I couldn't make any sense out of 8D: Something that's asked (PRICE). After the top was sorted, though, the puzzle was very much a fast ride to the finish. I somehow remembered that RAJ was a character on that show I never could stand (39D: "The Big Bang Theory" role). I never saw "Moonraker," which feels like a betrayal of my gender/age cohort, but it wasn't hard to work out RIO


I love that the puzzle went to D&D instead of social media for DMS (49A: Leads, as a D&D campaign). The "DM" stands for "Dungeon Master," and to DM is to play that role in the game. Retro! (although people still play D&D ... it's just that in my mind, anyone playing it is automatically transported back in time to the early '80s ... a wormhole opens up the second you start playing ... it's weird). I balked a tiny bit at BUDDY MOVIES, since "BUDDY COMEDY" feels like the more correct phrase, esp. for this clue, but sure, BUDDY MOVIES, that sounds fine (26D: "Booksmart" and "Dumb and Dumber," e.g.). Certainly not "off" enough to ruin my enjoyment of this puzzle. Wow, look at that! Done with the write-up at 5am! What a ride. And the thunderstorm has (mostly) passed. And the birds are singing their "WTF!?!"s. Cool. Good day.

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld 

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

Southern cornmeal dish / FRI 6-17-22 / 1987 Lionel Richie hit / Whose work may be all play / Comic who said I'm not addicted to cocaine I just like the way it smells / Popular poster

$
0
0
Constructor: Pao Roy

Relative difficulty: Easy (maybe Easy-Medium)


THEME: none 

Word of the Day: PALADINS (10D: Heroic knights) —

\The Paladins (or Twelve Peers) are twelve fictional knights of legend, the foremost members of Charlemagne's court in the 8th century. They first appear in the medieval (12th century) chanson de geste cycle of the Matter of France, where they play a similar role to the Knights of the Round Table in Arthurian romance. In these romantic portrayals, the chivalric paladins represent Christianity against a Saracen (Muslim) invasion of Europe. The names of the paladins vary between sources, but there are always twelve of them (a number with Christian associations) led by Roland (spelled Orlando in later Italian sources). The paladins' most influential appearance is in The Song of Roland, written between 1050 and 1115, which narrates the heroic death of Roland at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass.

The legend is based on the historical Umayyad invasion of Gaul and subsequent conflict in the Marca Hispanica between the Frankish Empire and the Emirate of Córdoba. The term paladinis from Old French, deriving from the Latin comes palatinus (count palatine), a title given to close retainers.

The paladins remained a popular subject throughout medieval French literature. Literature of the Italian Renaissance (15th and 16th centuries) introduced more fantasy elements into the legend, which later became a popular subject for operas in the Baroque music of the 16th and 17th centuries. During the 19th and early 20th centuries the term was reused outside fiction for small numbers of close military confidants serving national leaders. Modern depictions of paladins are often an individual knight-errant holy warrior or combat healer, influenced by the paladin character class that appeared in Dungeons & Dragons in 1975. (wikipedia)

• • •

PLOT TWIST
: I loved this one. ON A SIDE NOTE: I did not love ON A SIDE NOTE. The more I look at it, the more plausible it seems, sadly (for me), but as I was solving, that was the one answer I had the most trouble parsing. I was trying to parse it from its opening letters, and that's the problem: the opening letters feel extraneous. If I use that phrase, or hear that phrase, I feel like it just comes in the form, "SIDE NOTE ..." The "ON A" was ??? and then even after I had NOTE I didn't really get it. Mr. DEEDS to the rescue there, for sure (34D: Mr. of film). I have three frowny faces written in the margin of my puzzle next to ON A (!) SIDE NOTE. Most of the rest of the margins are filled with "good"s and asterisks and "!!!" and smiley faces. Oh, looks like I have an arrow pointing from the frowny faces to SOU ... but SOU (extremely old-school crosswordese) is extremely tolerable when it's not part of a crosswordese avalanche and is being used deliberately and strategically to hold larger, more interesting parts of the puzzle together (as it is here). Definitely got a good dose of that whoosh-whoosh feeling I look forward to on Fridays. I even got it from a "?" clue, as 27D: One with sound judgment? sent me plunging down the west side of the grid off of just the "AU-." And in the places where I did struggle (a bit), there was a payoff that made it worth it. I'm thinking primarily of the NE, where I threw "IT'S A DATE" over to the east side of the grid, filled a bunch of the 4-letter answers above it, and *still* couldn't make any of those long Downs work. Considered pulling "IT'S A DATE" because I wanted GALAHADS for PALADINS, couldn't figure out what word was supposed to follow DRAMA, and had no idea what was going on with -AKETA- at 12D. But I hung in there, realized the complicated-sounding "file type" was just PDF (10A: File type used in paper-to-digital archiving), and was rewarded for my patience with both PALADINS (ah, the figures from "The Matter of France" in medieval literature *and* the D&D character class, I know them both pretty well), and FAKE TATTOO, which is just fabulous. That is, the answer is solid, but that clue was fabulous, for sure (12D: "Mom" for a day, say). Really enjoyed this from start to finish, with very few bumps along the way.


Although ... can I really say I "enjoy" an answer like INFLUENCER. It's one of the worst ideas / concepts / phenomena I can think of in the social media era. It bespeaks an unwarranted and youth-cultish power, primarily in the service of brands (i.e. capitalism), so it both seems nefarious and makes me sad for the youths. Every generation has its idols, so there's nothing truly new here, but somehow that idolization feels ... I dunno, weaponized by contemporary social media platforms, which are newly and uniquely able to harness it (for cash and / or to spread disinformation). The whole INFLUENCER thing feels extremely bound up with consumerism ... but again, youth culture has always been that way. Anyway, I hate the idea of the INFLUENCER, but as a *crossword answer*, I do admit it feels current and lively. I like that it sits under POOL NOODLE. Hard to look cool when you're sitting under a POOL NOODLE. Are there POOL NOODLE INFLUENCERs? If there are, well, that is a YouTube channel I might check out.

Bicycle Wheel (1913)
[36A: Like some Marcel Duchamp works (DADAIST)]

Really loved PLOT TWIST, both at the answer and clue level (1A: It was all a dream, maybe)—very nice way to start the puzzle. I wanted the LOFT to be a GARRET but of course that didn't fit (2D: Artist's pad, maybe). Then I thought "sketch pad," which is probably what the clue wanted me to do. Other clues that flummoxed me included the wonderful [Team building?], which is transparent ... once you actually see the answer (ARENA). But before then ... well, I really should've noted the lack of a hyphen in the clue (or the space between the words: looks like the term meaning "building of teams" is frequently spelled as one word, "teambuilding"). Anyway, it's literally a building for a team. Surprised by literalness! I had "GET ME!?" before "GET IT?" (18A: "Catch my drift?"), due entirely to the "my" in the clue. I was pleasantly surprised that I was able drudge up "SELA" from Mr. Richie's really ridiculously extensive pop hit catalogue. I mentally penciled it in and then discovered yes, my memory was correct, that was the title of one of his songs. Is this better or worse than [Actress Ward]? Who can say? Loved the clue on BOUT (51A: Round and round and round?)—the cluing was remarkably on point today. Did not love the clue on Richard PRYOR, which is to say I would've loved a clue that didn't evoke his addiction. If you need your clue to be edgy, you know, he's got a lot about race, including a really great bit about the cops killing Black people with impunity ...  But at least this cocaine line is his own joke about himself, not the general public or hack comedians using him as a cheap punchline, and punching bag (as they did for years and years and years). And it's a good line. And I always like seeing his name. So even this answer didn't really bring me down. I'm going to PIPE DOWN now. Bye.

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

Queer heroine in the DC universe / SAT 6-18-22 / Best-selling novel that begins in Pondicherry India / 19th-century activist Dorothea Dix / Performance in Studio 8H / Peshwari raisin-filled fare / Audible finger wags / Fitness activity done while suspended in a hammock

$
0
0
Constructor: Brooke Husic

Relative difficulty: Easy 


THEME: none 

Word of the Day: NAT Adderley (62D: Jazz trumpeter Adderley) —

Nathaniel Carlyle Adderley (November 25, 1931 – January 2, 2000) was an American jazz trumpeter. He was the younger brother of saxophonist Julian "Cannonball" Adderley, whom he supported and played with for many years.

Adderley's composition "Work Song" (1960) is a jazz standard, and also became a success on the pop charts after singer Oscar Brown Jr. wrote lyrics for it. [...] While he was an integral part of the Cannonball Adderley Quintet, this was not the only project occupying his time in his career as professional jazz musician. Since moving to New York, he had been recording outside the Adderley group. He worked with Kenny ClarkeWes Montgomery, and Walter Booker.

Other projects included the film A Man Called Adam (1966). In the film, Sammy Davis Jr.'s character plays the trumpet. Since Davis could not himself play the trumpet, Adderley was hired to ghost everything that the character played. (wikipedia)

• • •

I tend to enjoy Brooke's puzzles (you can see her bylines at The New Yorker and the American Values Club Crossword and all kindsa places), but I think I've done (or tried to do) one too many of her Extremely Hard "experimental" crosswords from her puzzle website, because even though I smile when I see her name, some part of me experiences a Pavlovian flinch, like "oh no ... trouble!" But it turns out that her mainstream puzzles are probably no harder than anyone else's puzzles, actually. They're just far more thoughtful and entertaining than the average fare. I know I'm going to get stuff from outside my specific wheelhouse (SKINCARE ROUTINE stuff, or contemporary pop culture stuff, or maybe science/tech stuff—Brooke's a scientist), but also enough inside-my-wheelhouse stuff (today, comics, ancient libraries, yoga, Macbeth) to make the puzzle feel familiar and welcoming. What I'm saying is that the puzzle manages to have a specific personality while also feeling broadly inclusive. It casts a wide net with its answers and cluing. Sometimes, some younger constructors make puzzles that, to me, feel fresh and new, but in a kind of clique-ish and exclusionary way, like they're meant to be a kind of "f*** you" to some imagined group of "traditional" solvers. This puzzle, however, manages to have something for everyone, while still proudly wearing its values on its sleeve (lots of women, lots of queer visibility, and for Brooke, if I remember correctly, no meat, no guns). Will no doubt deserves some credit for the balance, but it starts with the constructor, and this one is Reliable.


I tried not to get too excited or hopeful when the puzzle just *gave* me BATWOMAN at 1A: Queer heroine in the DC Universe. I used to have a BATWOMAN figurine ("action figure?") on display in my home office (i.e. where I am right now), but I really Marie Kondo'd this place recently and lots of the knickknackier-type stuff went into storage. Anyway, I became a BATWOMAN fan sometime between when she was rebooted in the comics (as said queer character) and when she eventually got her own TV show. I have largely put superhero comics / movies behind me now, but I will always have a fondness for her. Her comics were fun to read because they had that cool noirish Batman vibe but it wasn't all the same boring, billionaire, "avenge my parents' death" stuff over and over and over. BATWOMAN felt like a real person with real problems. But enough of this NERDFEST ... back to crosswords! (LOL). I am one hundred percent sure that I have seen CHIWETEL EJIOFOR in some puzzle pretty recently ... but apparently still not 100% on the spelling. I was like "ooh, it's CHIWETE ... er, ends in -OR or maybe -FOR? ... damn it!" Luckily the crosses were all fairly simple. That "J" was the last letter to fall:


Also needed a bunch of crosses to see SKINCARE ROUTINE, but again, those crosses came quickly and in abundance, so no real struggle was involved. My one big miss was an experiment that I knew was likely to fail, but I wanted to plug it in and see. I had TIME IS... at 60A: "We don't need to rush"("TIME IS ON OUR SIDE") and wrote in TIME IS OUR FRIEND. Mwah, perfect fit. But I should've remembered Kurt Russell's famous words in Vanilla Sky:

[I've never actually seen this movie, what in the hell is happening!?]

This massive misstep wasn't so massive, since I knew it was a risk and was always willing to pull it quickly if need be. And need did be, although I did try to "confirm" TIME IS OUR FRIEND by writing in TENNIS at 47D: Match point? (TINDER). No dice, though, ultimately.


Pretty sexy vibe to this one, or ... at least there's lots sex-related stuff. From BATWOMAN's queerness to PAN-sexuality to TINDER "YOU UP?" ACHING RAWNESS SNOGging ... I wanna say JUMPS ON and NAIL should be in there too. So yeah ... WOW, just WOW, a lot of heat, a lot of FIRE in this one. Good morning. And good day.

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld 

P.S. TINDER (47D: Match point?) is a dating app, i.e. a "point" where one can make a "match," in case that wasn't clear.

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]

Listed obsolescently / SUN 6-19-22 / Cocktail with an energy boost / Prankster's smug shout / Avenger who stepped into the role of Captain America / Like one of Michael Jackson's hands when performing / Inapplicable stat for electric cars / Best slain by Hercules in his fourth labor / Actor in much-publicized 2022 defamation case / Marijuana strains said to be more invigorating / Two-player board game with spies and bombs / Roman god often depicted with a radiant crown

$
0
0
Constructor: Jeremy Newton

Relative difficulty: No idea ... let's say ... Easy to Easy-Medium?


THEME:"Some Light Reading"— grid depicts seven different stoplights, in various states of coloration (red, green, or yellow); the colors stand for colors in the Acrosses that run through them and for STOP, GREEN, or GO (respectively) in the Downs:

Theme answers:
  • INFRARED SPECTRUM / STOPGAPS (7A: Range of light that's invisible to the human eye)
  • WINTERGREEN MINTS / GO STALE (23A: Strong breath fresheners / 27D: Lose its spark, as a relationship)
  • VODKA RED BULL / HEART-STOPPING (60A: Cocktail with an energy boost / 35D: Thrilling)
  • IN THE YELLOWPAGES / "I'LL (GO [or] STOP) NOW" (63A: Listed, obsolescently / 43D: "It's my turn" [or] Comment after rambling on)
  • EVERGREEN STATE / "DON'T GO THERE" (66A: Washington, with "the" / 37D: "That's a touchy subject")
  • CATCH RED-HANDED / MAKE A STOP (103A: Bust mid-crime / 77D: Pull off the road for gas or snacks, say)
  • THE JOLLY GREEN GIANT / HAS A GO (109A: Mascot who made his Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade debut in 2017 / 80D: Tries)
Word of the Day: FALCON (85D: Avenger who stepped into the role of Captain America) —

Falcon (Samuel Thomas "SamWilson) is a superhero appearing in American comic books published by Marvel Comics. The character was introduced by writer-editor Stan Lee and artist Gene Colan in Captain America #117 (Sept. 1969), and was the first African-American superhero in mainstream comic books.

As the superhero Falcon, Wilson uses mechanical wings to fly, and has limited telepathic and empathic control over birds. After Steve Rogers retires, Wilson becomes Captain America in All-New Captain America #1 (Jan. 2015) and leader of the Avengers. Wilson's deceased nephew was the Incredible Hulk's sometime-sidekick Jim Wilson, one of the first openly HIV-positive comic-book characters. Jim Wilson's father Gideon Wilson would go on to join the Gamma Corps.

Sam Wilson as Falcon and Captain America has made several media appearances, including in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, where the character is portrayed by Anthony Mackie in the films Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014), Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015), Ant-Man (2015), Captain America: Civil War (2016), Avengers: Infinity War (2018), Avengers: Endgame (2019); and the television miniseries The Falcon and the Winter Soldier (2021). (wikipedia)

• • •

I was just thinking "three very good puzzles in a row, that's an extraordinary and anomalous run, I wonder how long the puzzle can keep it up?" So I jinxed it, I guess, because the streak stops hard at three. I should've known Sunday would let me down, again. I'm like Charlie Brown and the football with Sundays. "Maybe this time..." But then no. Everything good about this puzzle is in its look—really impressive to get those black square formations looking exactly like traffic lights, and maintaining symmetry with the light placement was a nice added touch. Beyond that, this puzzle had nothing to offer except one very creative answer (VODKA RED BULL). The rest was easy, humorless, surpriseless, and too often awkward, clunky, or downright ugly. The gimmick was a cinch to uncover, and once you know it, it has no gifts left to give. Actually, there was one "gift," and it was the most baffling and inexcusable part of the theme: the Down clue running through the yellow light. So if green means GO and red means STOP, yellow means ... SLOW? WAIT? CAUTION? Like, I had no ideas. Finished the puzzle with no ideas. Couldn't even really make sense of the way the clue was worded, with that strange bracketed [or] in the middle of it. Do you really expect me to believe, and to have understood, as I was solving, that the yellow light there meant STOP *or* GO. "I'LL STOP NOW"& "I'LL GO NOW"!? It is true that you can choose to stop when you see yellow or you can choose to go when you see yellow but you can choose to do a lot of things and none of this has anything to do with what the color formally means, which is "proceed with caution." Admittedly, that is a phrase that would be hard to rebus. But the fact that the yellow was both words (STOP and GO), or either word, I guess, oof, that was awkward. Also, HASAGO and MAKEASTOP feel like a theme idea running on fumes, and the last thing this puzzle needed was two more ___ A ___ answers when it already had two "EAT A SANDWICH" representatives in play with LOSE A GAME and HIRE A DJ, LOL, that second one is so bad it's almost good. Almost. After you admire the puzzle's look and grasp the theme, it's just a boring walk to the end. There's very little to entertain you along the way, unless you are entertained by ACIDHEAD, in which case, what is wrong with you? Who says that? What year is it?


The fill really is dreary. I kinda like VPPICK (60D: Major political announcement before a convention, informally). That's a very showy and unexpected string of letters. But too often I was dealing with stuff like ADES and BAAED and ILIE and RETAP and TEEHEE and OREIDA, or else Johnny f***ing DEPP (please, cancel culture, can't you be real, just once!?), or else UNGLOVED, what in the world? So the architecture gets high marks, but as for the actual feel of living inside and moving through the architecture ... that was less satisfying. Nice to look at, not so nice to solve. You should probably trust a puzzle when it tells you straight off that IT'S BAD (1A: "In a word ... awful!"). I will admit that my mood was soured right away by the fact that I couldn't (or wasn't willing to) solve the puzzle in my normal solving software, which doesn't do the cutesy visual stuff that the NYTXW seems to find increasingly integral to the solving experience. I got a legit WARNING as soon as I started in:


My instinct was, of course, "I'll show you who can solve what" and then I bumbled around and finally figured out the gimmick, but found it so dull so quickly that I decided "I'm not doing this blind solving stuff any more" and switched over to the puzzle page so I could see the colored grid. And then that made everything dramatically easier, though no less pleasant. Again, the grid looks sweet. But people gotta solve the thing. 

["Should I be reading STOP or GO / I don't know!"]

Notes:
  • 85D: Avenger who stepped into the role of Captain America (FALCON) — just as BATWOMAN was right up my alley yesterday, so FALCON, today ... isn't. I couldn't care less about the MCU. I tried, Lord knows I tried. But that was hours and hours and hours of my life lost to forgettable mediocrity. I can't believe how many damn movies there have been and I don't believe for one second that twenty years from now anyone will be able to keep any of them straight or even remember them as discrete movies. It'll just be ... a haze of brands. Annnnnyway, FALCON. I was not aware. Or I was, and I forgot. I might be interested in reading those early comics, though. I thought Marvel's Luke Cage (aka Power Man) was the earliest mainstream Black superhero, with DC's Black Lightning shortly thereafter, so now I'm intrigued. But only from a strictly historical, and strictly comics perspective. The MCU can, as I say, BITE ME (4D: "Oh, shove it!").
  • 45D: Marijuana strains said to be more invigorating (SATIVAS)— more invigorating ... than what? TWO PAIR? Your MEDS? PAULINE Kael? Help me out here.
  • 92D: Prankster's smug shout ("GOT YA!") — there is no font big enough or italicized enough to capture how loudly I want to say "That Is Not How You Spell That!" The word is GOTCHA. There is a singer named GOTYE. Maybe you were thinking of him. You remember him. He's somebody that you used to know.

Now it's time for this week's

Letter to the Editor

This week's letter comes from Ellie Gottlieb, a teenager from Massachusetts, who has a special request. Ellie writes:
My name is Ellie and I'm a teenager from Massachusetts (near Natick!). I've grown up doing the NYT crossword with my dad, who is an avid reader of your blog. He does the crossword almost every day and then reads your blog (he agrees with you most of the time). I was wondering if you could give my dad a shout-out on your blog post for the crossword on Father's Day? His name is Daniel. I totally understand if it isn't possible, but I thought it was worth a try. 

I replied (and this is verbatim): "100% yes." Then I said maybe she should do the shout-out herself. And she agreed. And here it is:

Shout-out to Daniel, crossword enthusiast and the best dad ever! Happy Father's Day! We love you! 

Hope that brightens your day, Daniel. You seem pretty lucky :)

Take care, everyone.

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld 

P.S. Hey if you wanted to get Dad a belated Father's Day gift, or anyone a belated Any Day gift, you could do worse than this (I have nothing to do with this creative endeavor; I just think it's cool, for obvious reasons):

[You can order the shirt here]

P.P.S. I'm always accepting Letters to the Editor about any crossword-related subject. Just email me at rexparker at icloud dot com and try to keep it under 300 words. Thanks!

[Follow Rex Parker on Twitter and Facebook]
Viewing all 4509 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>