Quantcast
Channel: Rex Parker Does the NYT Crossword Puzzle
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4443

Contralto singer known as the "First Lady of Radio" / SAT 1-11-25 / River featured in the Rig Veda / First of four emperors in the "Year of the Four Emperors" / Note extender, in sheet music / Common format for an essay, informally / Professional squatters? / Taiwanese electronics brand / Pride parade participant? / Simple house style with gables / Some sweet pick-me-ups / Jester named in a Shakespeare soliloquy

$
0
0
Constructor: Ryan McCarty

Relative difficulty: Medium to Medium-Challenging


THEME: none 

Word of the Day: Rig Veda (23A: River featured in the Rig Veda = INDUS) —

The Rigveda or Rig Veda (Sanskritऋग्वेदIASTṛgveda, from ऋच्, "praise" and वेद, "knowledge") is an ancient Indian collection of Vedic Sanskrit hymns (sūktas). It is one of the four sacred canonical Hindu texts (śruti) known as the Vedas. Only one Shakha of the many survive today, namely the Śakalya Shakha. Much of the contents contained in the remaining Shakhas are now lost or are not available in the public forum.

The Rigveda is the oldest known Vedic Sanskrit text. Its early layers are among the oldest extant texts in any Indo-European language. The sounds and texts of the Rigveda have been orally transmitted since the 2nd millennium BCE. Philological and linguistic evidence indicates that the bulk of the Rigveda Samhita was composed in the northwestern region of the Indian subcontinent (see Rigvedic rivers), most likely between c. 1500 and 1000 BCE, although a wider approximation of c. 1900–1200 BCE has also been given. (wikipedia)

• • •

***ATTENTION: READERS AND FELLOW SOLVERS***
 : It's early January, which means it's time once again for my annual week-long pitch for financial contributions to the blog. Every year I ask readers to consider what the blog is worth to them on an annual basis and give accordingly. Writing this blog is a joy, but it is also a job—an everyday, up-by-4am job. My morning schedule is regular as hell. So regular that my cats know my routine and will start walking all over me if I even *stir* after 3am. You ever lie there in the early morning, dying to simply roll over or stretch, but knowing that the second you do, the second you so much as budge, the cats will take it as a signal that you're through with sleep and ready to serve them? So you just lie perfectly still, trying to get every ounce of bedrest you can before the cats ruin it all? That's me, every morning. I guess you could say they "help" get me up on time to write, but come on, I have an alarm for that. The cats are adorable, but frankly they're no help at all. After I feed them, I go upstairs to write, and what do they do? They go straight back to sleep. Here I'll show you. This was two days ago, when I came downstairs after writing:
And this was yesterday, same time:
Those pictures are from two different days, I swear. And I'm guessing when I go downstairs this morning, I'll find much the same thing. They are beautiful creatures, but they cannot solve or type or bring me warm beverages. When it comes to blogging, I'm on my own. And look, I'm not asking for pity. The truth is, I love my life (and my cats), but the truth *also* is that writing this blog involves a lot of work. I get up and I solve and I write, hoping each day to give you all some idea of what that experience was like for me, as well as some insight into the puzzle's finer (or less fine) qualities—the intricacies of its design, the trickiness of its clues, etc. The real value of the blog, though, is that it offers a sort of commiseration. While I like to think my writing is (at its best) entertaining, I know that sometimes all people need is someone who shares their joy or feels their pain. If you hate a clue, or get stuck and struggle, or otherwise want to throw the puzzle across the room, you know I'm here for you, and that even if my experience is not identical to yours, I Understand! I understand that even though "it's just a puzzle," it's also a friend and a constant companion and a ritual and sometimes a Betrayer! I don't give you objective commentary—I give you my sincere (if occasionally hyperbolic) feelings about the puzzle, what it felt like to solve it. I can dress those feelings up in analytical clothes, sure, but still, ultimately, I'm just one human being out here feeling my puzzle feelings. And hopefully that makes you feel something too—ideally, something good, but hey I'm not picky. Whatever keeps you coming back! Hate-readers are readers too!

Whatever kind of reader you are, you're a reader, and I would appreciate your support. This blog has covered the NYTXW every day, without fail, for over eighteen (18!?) years, and except for two days a month (when my regular stand-ins Mali and Clare write for me), and an occasional vacation or sick day (when I hire substitutes to write for me), it's me who's doing the writing. Over the years, I have received all kinds of advice about "monetizing" the blog, invitations to turn it into a subscription-type deal à la Substack or Patreon. And maybe I'd make more money that way, I don't know, but that sort of thing has never felt right for me. And honestly, does anyone really need yet another subscription to manage? As I've said in years past, I like being out here on Main, on this super old-school blogging platform, just giving it away for free and relying on conscientious addicts like yourselves to pay me what you think the blog's worth. It's just nicer that way. 

How much should you give? Whatever you think the blog is worth to you on a yearly basis. Whatever that amount is is fantastic. Some people refuse to pay for what they can get for free. Others just don't have money to spare. All are welcome to read the blog—the site will always be open and free. But if you are able to express your appreciation monetarily, here are three options. First, a Paypal button (which you can also find in the blog sidebar on the homepage):

Second, a mailing address (checks can be made out to "Michael Sharp" or "Rex Parker"):

Rex Parker c/o Michael Sharp
54 Matthews St
Binghamton, NY 13905

The third, increasingly popular option is Venmo; if that's your preferred way of moving money around, my handle is @MichaelDavidSharp (the last four digits of my phone are 4878, in case Venmo asks you, which I guess it does sometimes, when it's not trying to push crypto on you, what the hell?!)

All Paypal contributions will be gratefully acknowledged by email. All Venmo contributions will get a little heart emoji, at a minimum :) All snail mail contributions will be gratefully acknowledged with hand-written postcards. I. Love. Snail Mail. I love seeing your gorgeous handwriting and then sending you my awful handwriting. It's all so wonderful. My daughter (Ella Egan) has once again designed my annual thank-you card, and once again the card features (wait for it) cats! 
Ida & Alfie, my little yin/yang sleepers! (They're slowly becoming friends, but don't tell them that—it makes them mad and they will deny it). Please note: I don't keep a "mailing list" and don't share my contributor info with anyone. And if you give by snail mail and (for some reason) don't want a thank-you card, just indicate "NO CARD." Again, as ever, I'm so grateful for your readership. Please know that your support means a lot to me and my family. Now on to today's puzzle... 

• • •

The trick today was to throw something, anything (well, anything correct), into that giant gulf in the center of the puzzle. After a fairly typical, not particularly hard NW corner, I was all set to plunge down into the heart of this thing, but nope (next Down) nope (next Down) ... nope? Front ends of three long Downs and: nothing. I had nothing:


I didn't even bother to start looking at the giant answers in the middle because traction is always Much more likely to come from shorter answers, so ... on to another corner. I tried the SW, which at first looked unpromising ("Year of Four Emperors" you say? Oh, of course, I am a learned person, that must be ... uh ... &^$$#!). I figured Robin Hood's bow was made of YEW, but that got me nowhere. What I am about to tell you feels more like a confession than a boast, believe me: the answer that got me started down there, which ended up being the key to the whole puzzle (I never lost momentum again) was: NUMETAL (31D: Music genre for Linkin Park and Limp Bizkit). Just looking at that "word" makes me embarrassed. If my musical tastes were the solar system (with me as the sun), you'd have Stevie Wonder and Lucinda Williams somewhere around Mercury and Elvis Costello and Big Thief in roughly the Venus position and then, let's see, NU-METAL, that would be ... well, the joke here would be "Uranus" but in reality we're talking Altair or possibly Zogbron (an ice planet in the Flibular Galaxy, of course it's real, shh). I am aware that Limp Bizkit (it hurts to write it) and Linkin Park (must they all do this with their names?) exist. They were pop culture phenomena. But I have never listened to a single one of their songs all the way through. And yet ... I somehow paid enough attention to know that whatever music they were making had, at some point, been given the name "NU METAL" (I don't even know if it's one word or two words or hyphenated, and I don't really care). So ... NU METAL to the rescue. I plugged that sucker in and the puzzle Lit. Up. Well, it still took a little push, a little patience, to get into the center, but I don't get anywhere in this puzzle without NU METAL.


There aren't actually a ton of names in this puzzle, but it *felt* like there were because several of them just stopped me cold, including two in that massive middle section. I know the name KATE SMITH (this helped eventually), but could tell you nothing about her. I hear a woman singing "You're a Grand Old Flag," is that her? Hmm, not seeing that. Just "God Bless America." She was tremendously popular during World War II. In my head, I get her confused with Ethel Merman (who, among other things, played Gopher's mom on The Love Boat). Both have big voices, but Merman was known more for musical theater (not radio). JAMES ROSS I got easily once I got into the middle (the Ross Sea shows up in crosswords a lot), but that JAKOB guy, yeeeeeow, oof, no (29D: Track star Ingebrigtsen who, at age 16, became the youngest person in history to run a sub-four-minute mile). I had the "K" and when OSKAR didn't work, I was like [shrug]. I also had a lot of trouble with GALBA, but again, as with KATE SMITH, at least I'd *heard* of GALBA, and so could infer it when I had enough crosses. Couldn't tell you a thing about GALBA (he succeeded Nero and ruled for seven months), but the name is there in my brain, for some reason. All the other names (CONAN, YODA, YORICK, RBG) were superfamiliar, even if the CONAN clue was no real help to me (38A: Television star who went on the "Legally Prohibited From Being Funny on Television Tour" in 2010). I thought it was going to be one of these guys who makes money making "jokes" about cancel culture or whatever. But 2010 was about when CONANlost his Tonight Show gig to Leno, so that must be the context.


I forgot to wonder whether I liked this puzzle or not. Hmm. I didn't dislike it, because I don't remember having any "ugh, come on!" reactions, except to SURE CURE, which is not a phrase I know (47A: Well, that works!). I know about sure things and sure bets, but I had SURE ___ and no idea what was supposed to follow. I had this same problem with DESK ___ (49A: Certain workplace protection?), and ___ PRESS (9D: Extractor used on some seeds and nuts), and GAME ___ (37A: Setting for balloon darts or a ringtoss). But no, there didn't seem to be anything wrong with the puzzle. Maybe a little trivia heavy for me, but overall it felt like a solid, sufficiently tough Saturday effort.


Points, in bullet form:
  • 26A: Pride parade participant? (LION) — good one. Loved it. Don't know whether LIONs actually "parade," but it hardly matters. They walk, sometimes together, so that's close enough.
  • 40A: Note extender, in sheet music (DOT)— been so long since I looked at sheet music that I forgot this. "In Western musical notation, a dotted note is a note with a small dot written after it.[a] In modern practice, the first dot increases the duration of the basic note by half (the original note with an extra beam) of its original value." (wikipedia)

  • 41A: Lothlórien in "The Lord of the Rings" (FOREST) — absolutely no idea. Never could get through those books, and those movies ... well, I got through them, but all they made me was sleepy. Peter Jackson peaked at Heavenly Creatures.
  • 2D: Locale of Niue and the Pitcairn Islands (OCEANIA) — I (bizarrely) had RAPA NUI here because I had CRANK UP instead of POWER UP at 1A: Get an engine going. Btw there are two "UP"s in this grid, but since they are about as far away from one another as possible, I doubt anyone but me will notice. No foul.
  • 6D: Professional squatters? (UMPS) — excellent. Second thing I got today after PIE (7D: Bit of "Sweeney Todd" fare).
  • 10D: Their petals are used to make a traditional Korean wine called "dugyeonju" (AZALEAS) — weird. I thought they were poisonous. I had the -LEAS part and wanted DAHLIAS (figuring maybe DATE BREAD was wrong somehow) (24A: Fruit-filled loaf).
  • 35D: Small juice container? (AA CELL)— we call them "double A batteries," but yeah, this works. "Juice" = power.
This week I'm highlighting the best puzzles of 2024 by focusing on one day at a time. I kept a spreadsheet of every puzzle I solved last year, complete with ratings from 0-100 (with 50 being my idea of an "average" NYTXW) (They really did average out to around 50, with Saturday being my fav day (avg 57.7), and Sunday (obviously) being my least fav (avg 42.9). 

Here are my Top Three Saturday Puzzles of 2024. (I'm not ranking them; it's nicer that way)
That's it, see you next time. Tomorrow, best Sundays of the year and Constructor of the Year for 2024!

Signed, Rex Parker, King of CrossWorld

[Follow Rex Parker on BlueSky and Facebook]

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4443

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>